期刊文献+

叶酸预防神经管畸形经济学效果的系统评价 被引量:3

Systematic evaluation of economic effect of folic acid in prevention of neural tube defect
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:系统评价叶酸预防神经管畸形的经济学效果。方法:在PubMed、Web of knowledge、Embase、NH SEED、CNKI、万方数据库对孕妇叶酸干预的文献进行检索。结果:共检索到6个国家11项研究,9篇是评价叶酸食品强化的成本效果〔3,4-6,8-9,11-13〕,另外2篇分析的是围孕期补充叶酸的成本效果〔7,10〕,其中只有1项研究〔11〕计算了间接成本,其他10项研究都只计算了花费的直接医疗成本。叶酸食品强化预防NTD的成本效益比,美国为4.3∶1,智利为11.8∶1,南非为30∶1,这些研究都显示通过围孕期补充叶酸预防神经管畸形是一种具有成本效果干预手段(除了新西兰叶酸食品强化项目之外)。结论:叶酸食品强化和围孕期直接补充叶酸,都是有效且具有成本效果的预防神经管畸形的干预措施。 Objective: To systematically evaluate the economic effect of folic acid in prevention of neural tube defect. Methods:The literatures about intervention of pregnant women with folic acid were retrieved in PubMed,Web of Knowledge,Embase,NH SEED,CNKI and Wanfang Database. Results: A total of 11 studies in 6 countries were retrieved,including 9 studies evaluating the cost effectiveness of folic acid food fortification〔3,4-6,8-9,11-13〕and 2 studies analyzing the cost effectiveness of folic acid food supplement during periconceptional period〔7,10〕; among11 studies,only one study〔11〕calculated the indirect cost,the other ten studies only calculated the direct cost;the cost performance ratios of folic acid food fortification in prevention of neural tube defect in American,Chile and South Africa were 4. 3∶1,11. 8∶ 1 and 30∶ 1,respectively; all the studies showed that folic acid supplement during periconceptional period was an intervention method with cost effectiveness in prevention of neural tube defect( except for the folic acid food fortification projects in New Zealand). Conclusion: Both folic acid food fortification and direct supplement of folic acid are intervention measures with effectiveness and cose- effectiveness in prevention of neural tube defect.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第16期2644-2647,共4页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 上海市公共卫生高端人才海外研修项目〔GWHW2012S10〕 上海市公共卫生优秀学科带头人培养计划〔GWDTR201205〕 上海市公共卫生重点学科建设项目-卫生经济〔12GWZX0601〕
关键词 叶酸 神经管畸形 经济学评价 Folic acid Neural tube defect Economic evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1陈英耀.中国出生缺陷疾病负担和预防策略的经济学评价[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2007:78.
  • 2Evers S,Goossens M,de Vet H,et al.Criteria list for as-sessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations:Consensus on Health Economic Criteria [ J ].Int J Technol Assess Health Care,2005,21(2):240-245.
  • 3Llanos A,Hertrampf E,Cortes F,et al.Cost-effectiveness of a folic acid fortification program in Chile [J].Health Policy,2007,83(2-3):295-303.
  • 4Dalziel K,Segal L,Katz R.Cost-effectiveness of mandatory folate fortification v.other options for the prevention of neural tube defects:results from Australia and New Zealand [ J ].Public Health Nutr,2010,13(4):566-578.
  • 5Bentley TG,Weinstein MC,Willett WC,et al.A cost-effec-tiveness analysis of folic acid fortification policy in the United States [J].Public Health Nutr,2008,12(4):455-467.
  • 6Grosse SD,Waitzman N J,Romano PS,et al.Reevaluating the benefits of folic acid fortification in the United States:economic analysis,regulation,and public health [J].Am J Public Health,2005,95(11):1917-1922.
  • 7Grosse SD,Ouyang L,Collins JS,et al.Economic evaluation of a neural tube defect recurrence-prevention program [ J ].Am J Prey Med,2008,35(6):572-577.
  • 8Hertrampf E,Cortes F.National food-fortification program with folic acid in Chile [J].Food Nutr Bull,2008,29(2 Suppl):S231-S237.
  • 9Jentink J,van de Vile-Hoekstra NW,de Jong-van den Berg LT,et al.Economic evaluation of folic acid food fortification in The Netherlands [J].Eur J Public Health,2008,18(3):270-274.
  • 10Postma M J,Londeman J,Veenstra M,et al.Cost-effective-ness of periconceptional supplementation of folic acid [ J].Pharm World Sci,2002,24(1):8-11.

二级参考文献2

共引文献27

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部