摘要
目的本文对比分析妇科腹部手术新式皮内缝合法与传统缝合方法对切口愈合的影响和效果。方法选取2012年5月至2013年5月于潍坊医学院附属医院就诊行开腹手术的病人200例。观察组:采用新式皮内缝合法100例(子宫肌瘤剔除50例,子宫全切50例),对照组:采用传统缝合方法 100例(子宫肌瘤剔除50例,子宫全切50例),比较观察组和对照组手术切口缝合时间、术后硬结、术后住院时间、切口甲级愈合率及术后半年疤痕增生情况等方面。结果观察组与对照组手术切口缝合时间、术后硬结、术后住院时间、切口甲级愈合率等方面差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组与对照组术后半年疤痕增生情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论妇科腹部手术新式皮内缝合法优于传统缝合方法,值得在临床大力推广。
Objective To contrastively analyze the influence and effects of the new incision seaming method and traditional suture means in gynecologic abdominal surgery on incision healing. Methods 200 patients were selected among those for abdominal opera-tion in Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical College from May 2012 to May 2013. 100 new intradermal suture cases （50 hysteromyo-ma myomectomy cases, 50 total hysterectomy cases） were adopted in the observation group. 100 cases with traditional seaming methods （50 hysteromyoma myomectomy cases, 50 total hysterectomy cases） were included in the control group. Operative incision suture time, postoperative scleroma, length of hospital stay, class A healing rate of incision and postoperative incision and scar hyperplasia of six months following surgery and so on were compared between the observation group and the control group. Results there were statisti-cally significant differences （P〈0.05） between the observation group and control group in terms of the operative incision suture time, postoperative scleroma, length of hospital stay, class A healing rate of incision, while the difference of postoperative incision and scar hyperplasia of six months following surgery between two groups were not statistically significant （P〉0.05）. Conclusion The new in-tradermal suture method in gynecologic abdominal surgery is superior to the traditional suture method, worthy of promoting clinically.
出处
《辽宁医学院学报》
CAS
2014年第3期62-64,共3页
Journal of Liaoning Medical University (LNMU) Bimonthly
关键词
新式皮内缝合法
传统缝合方法
切口愈合
关腹时间
术后住院时间
new intradermal suture method
traditional suture method
healing of incision
time of closing abdomen
hospital days after operation
