期刊文献+

磁共振弥散加权成像量化分析在乳腺病变诊断中的价值 被引量:7

Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-weighted MRI in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价磁共振弥散加权成像(Diffusion-weighted Imaging,DWI)量化分析在乳腺病变诊断中的价值。方法对经病理证实的72例乳腺疾病患者(85个病灶)以及10名健康自愿者行DWI,扩散敏感系数(b)值分别为0、500、1,000 s/mm^2。分别测量40个正常乳腺,22个恶性病灶,50个良性病灶,13个炎性病灶在不同b值时的ADC值,比较分析各组ADC值;采用两种方法确定乳腺良恶性病变ADC诊断阈值,并分析比较两者在乳腺恶性病变诊断中的效能。结果①b=500 s/mm^2时,恶性病变、炎性病变、良性病变、正常腺体的平均ADC值分别为(1.10±0.13)、(0.90±0.19)、(1.68±0.30)、(2.03±0.30)×10^-3mm^2/s;b=1,000 s/mm^2时,恶性病变、炎性病变、良性病变、正常腺体的平均ADC值分别为(0.96±0.16)、(0.68±0.20)、(1.53±0.33)、(1.85±0.31)×10^-3mm^2/s。②取乳腺恶性病变平均ADC值的95%可信区间上限作为阈值时,b=500 s/mm^2时ADC阈值为1.16×10^-3mm^2/s;b=1,000 s/mm^2时ADC阈值为1.03×10^-3mm^2/s。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定ADC阈值,b=500 s/mm^2时ADC阈值为1.30×10^-3mm^2/s;b=1,000 s/mm^2时ADC阈值为1.14×10^-3mm^2/s。结论DWI量化分析对乳腺良(不包括炎性病变)、恶性病变的诊断有较高的价值;采用ROC曲线确定的b=1,000 s/mm^2时的ADC阈值对诊断乳腺恶性病变的准确性、敏感性、特异性均较高。 Objective To evaluate the value of quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI in the diagno-sis of breast lesions. Methods 72 cases with pathologically conifrmed breast diseases (85 lesions) and 10 healthy volunteers underwent DWI. The diffusion-sensitive factor (b) values were 0, 500, 1,000 s/mm^2. The ADC values of 40 normal breasts, 22 malignant lesions, 50 benign lesions and 13 inlfammatory lesions at different b values were measured and analyzed comparatively. Two methods were used to determine the ADC diagnosis threshold value of benign and malignant breast lesions, and the efifcacy of the two methods in the diagnosis of malignant breast lesions were analyzed comparatively. Results ①When b value was 500 s/mm^2, the mean ADC values of the malignant lesions, inlfammatory lesions, benign lesions and normal glands were as follows, respectively, (1.10±0.13), (0.90±0.19), (1.68±0.30), (2.03±0.30) ×10^-3mm^2/s;When b value was 1,000 s/mm^2, the mean ADC values of the malignant lesions, inlfammatory lesions, benign lesions and normal glands were as follows, respec-tively, (0.96±0.16), (0.68±0.20), (1.53±0.33), (1.85±0.31) ×10^-3mm^2/s.②If the average ADC value of breast ma-lignant lesions in the upper 95%conifdence interval was selected as the threshold value, when b value was 500 s/mm^2, the ADC threshold was 1.16 ×10^-3mm^2/s;when b value was 1,000 s/mm^2, the ADC threshold was 1.03 ×10^-3mm^2/s. If the ADC threshold was drawn by ROC curve, when b value was 500 s/mm^2, the ADC threshold was 1.30 ×10^-3mm^2/s;when b value was 1,000 s/mm^2, the ADC threshold was 1.14 ×10^-3mm^2/s. Conclusion Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging is helpful in the diagnosis of breast benign lesions (inlfammatory lesions were not in-cluded) and malignant lesions. The ADC threshold determined by ROC curve has better accuracy, sensitivity and speciifcity in the diagnosis of breast malignant lesions when b value is 1,000 s/mm^2.
出处 《中国血液流变学杂志》 CAS 2013年第4期751-755,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hemorheology
关键词 乳腺病变 磁共振成像 弥散加权成像 量化分析 breast lesions magnetic resonance imaging diffusion weighted imaging quantitative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, et al. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002, 15(6): 693 - 704.
  • 2杨正汉,冯逢,王霄英.磁共振成像技术指南:检查规范、临床策略及新技术应用[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2007:109-119.
  • 3Sinha S, Sinha U. Functional magnetic resonance of human breast tumors: diffusion and perfusion imaging[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2002, 980:95 - 115.
  • 4Mardor Y, Pfeffer R, Spiegelmann R, et al. Early detection of response to radiation therapy in patients with brain malignancies using conventional and high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21(6): 1094 - 1100.
  • 5顾雅佳,冯晓源,唐峰,彭卫军,毛健,杨文涛.乳腺肿瘤的MRI扩散特征及参数选定[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(5):451-456. 被引量:45
  • 6Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion- weighted imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002, 16(2): 172 - 178.
  • 7Furman-Haran E, Degani H, Kirshenbaum K, et al. A two-center clinical testing of the 3TP method for contrast enhanced breast MILl[C]. Scotland, Glasgow: Proceedings of the 9th annual meeting of ISMRM, 2001. 566.
  • 8郭勇,王辅林,蔡幼铨,蔡祖龙,高元桂.乳腺肿瘤表观弥散系数与组织细胞密度相关性研究[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2002,10(4):241-243. 被引量:69

二级参考文献19

  • 1Noguchi K, Watanabe N, Nagayoshi T, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI in distinguishing between brain brain abscess and tumour: a preliminary report. Neuroradiology,1999,41(3):171
  • 2LeBihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology,1988,168:497
  • 3Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha S, Debruhl ND, et al. Estimation of coefficients for benign and malignant breast lesions using echo planar MR imaging. Radiology (Supplement),1998,209(p):468
  • 4Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging,1999,9:53
  • 5Le Biha D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology,1986,161:401
  • 6Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et alP. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology,1996,200:639
  • 7Bone B, Wiberg MK, Parrado C, et al. Mechanism of contrast enhancement in breast lesions at MR imaging. Acta Radiol,1998,39:494-500.
  • 8Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002,16 : 172-178.
  • 9DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 1988, 44:837 -845.
  • 10Bammer R. Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol, 2003,45:169-184.

共引文献110

同被引文献46

引证文献7

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部