期刊文献+

Comparing the reinforcement capacity of welded steel mesh and a thin spray-on liner using large scale laboratory tests 被引量:7

Comparing the reinforcement capacity of welded steel mesh and a thin spray-on liner using large scale laboratory tests
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Steel mesh is used as a passive skin confinement medium to supplement the active support provided by rock bolts for roof and rib control in underground coal mines. Thin spray-on liners(TSL) are believed to have the potential to take the place of steel mesh as the skin confinement medium in underground mines.To confirm this belief, large scale laboratory experiments were conducted to compare the behaviour of welded steel mesh and a TSL, when used in conjunction with rock bolts, in reinforcing strata with weak bedding planes and strata prone to guttering, two common rock conditions which exist in coal mines. It was found that while the peak load taken by the simulated rock mass with weak bedding planes acting as the control sample(no skin confinement) was 2494 kN, the corresponding value of the sample with 5 mm thick TSL reinforcement reached 2856 kN. The peak load of the steel mesh reinforced sample was only2321 kN, but this was attributed to the fact that one of the rock bolts broke during the test. The TSL reinforced sample had a similar post-yield behaviour as the steel mesh reinforced one. The results of the large scale guttering test indicated that a TSL is better than steel mesh in restricting rock movement and thus inhibiting the formation of gutters in the roof. Steel mesh is used as a passive skin confinement medium to supplement the active support provided by rock bolts for roof and rib control in underground coal mines. Thin spray-on liners (TSL) are believed to have the potential to take the place of steel mesh as the skin confinement medium in underground mines. To confirm this belief, large scale laboratory experiments were conducted to compare the behaviour of welded steel mesh and a TSL, when used in conjunction with rock bolts, in reinforcing strata with weak bedding planes and strata prone to guttering, two common rock conditions which exist in coal mines. It was found that while the peak load taken by the simulated rock mass with weak bedding planes acting as the control sample (no skin confinement) was 2494 kN, the corresponding value of the sample with 5 mm thick TSL reinforcement reached 2856 kN. The peak load of the steel mesh reinforced sample was only 2321 kN, but this was attributed to the fact that one of the rock bolts broke during the test. The TSL rein-forced sample had a similar post-yield behaviour as the steel mesh reinforced one. The results of the large scale guttering test indicated that a TSL is better than steel mesh in restricting rock movement and thus inhibiting the formation of gutters in the roof.
机构地区 School of Civil
出处 《International Journal of Mining Science and Technology》 SCIE EI 2014年第3期373-377,共5页 矿业科学技术学报(英文版)
关键词 Steel mesh Thin spray-on liners Large scale laboratory experiments Strata with weak bedding planes Strata prone to guttering 实验室测试 钢丝网 加固 焊接 能力 眼线 煤矿井下 峰值负荷
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Dolinar DR. Load capacity and stiffness characteristics of screen materials used for surface control in underground coal mines. In: Proceedings of 25th international conference on ground control in mining. Morgantown: 2006. p. 152-158.
  • 2Tannant DD. Load capacity and stiffness of welded wire, chain link, and expanded metal mesh. In: Proceedings of international seminar on surface support in mining: membrane, shotcrete and mesh. Perth; 2001. p. 399-402.
  • 3Thompson AG. Rock support action of mesh quantified by testing and analysis. Aust Centre Geomech 2004:391-8.
  • 4Nemcik J, Porter I, Baafi E, Lukey C. Geotechnical assessment of skin reinforcement in underground mines. In: Proceedings of 28th international conference on ground control in mining. Morgantown; 2009. p. 256-260.
  • 5Ahn T. Thermal and mechanical studies of thin spray-on liner (TSL) for concrete tunnelling. London: University of Western Ontario; 2011.
  • 6Yilmaz H. Tensile strength testing of thin spray-on liner products (TSLs) and shotcrete. J South Aft Inst Min Metall 2010;110:559-69.
  • 7Tannant DD, Ozturk H. Evaluation of test methods for measuring adhesion between a liner and rock. In: Proceedings of 3rd international seminar on surface support liners. Quebec City: 2003.
  • 8Saydam S, Yilmaz H, Stacey TR. A new testing approach for thin spray-on liners: double-sided shear strength (DSS) test. In: Proceedings of 3rd international seminar on surface support liners: thin spray-on liners. shotcrete and mesh. Quebec City; 2003.
  • 9Yilmaz H. Shear-bond strength testing of thin spray-on liners. J South Afr lnst Min Metall 2007;110:519-30.
  • 10Lukey C, Spinks G, Baafi E. Porter I, Nemcik J. Polymer-based alternative to steel mesh for coal mine strata reinforcement. In: Proceedings of the coal 2008 8th underground coal operator's conference. Wollongong; 2008. p. 110-116.

同被引文献54

引证文献7

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部