摘要
为相关部门实施"两法"以及制定"专家辅助人出庭协助鉴定意见质证实施细则"提供参考资料,需要对"有专门知识的人"出庭就鉴定人的鉴定意见质证等六个亟待解决的实务问题进行探讨。"有专门知识的人"法律上不具有唯一性且未反映其身份和职责特点,宜更名为"专家辅助人";对"专家辅助人"的条件和资格确认提出主张;探讨"专家辅助人"出庭质证规则的四个主要问题;对"专家辅助人"在法庭上向鉴定人提问的内容与方式和参加鉴定意见辩论应掌握的要点提出若干规范性建议;对"专家辅助人"法庭质证意见的性质与作用发表评论性意见,并认为专家辅助人应依法进行统一管理,建立以司法行政机关管理为主、人民法院管理为辅的两结合管理模式。
In order for the implementation of the Civil and Criminal Procedure Laws, and to draft the implementation rules for the expert assistant appearing in court to assist cross-examination, there are some practical problems to be resolved. This paper suggests： the person with specialized knowledge should be renamed as the expert assistant, as the original term is not exclusive and does not reflect his identity and legal characteristics. The qualification of the expert assistant is proposed. Four main prob- lems on cross-examination by the expert assistant in court are analyzed. Some suggestions are also given for the content and the way of questioning when the expert assistant cross-examines an appraisal expert. It gives comment on the nature and effect of the expert assistant＇s opinions. The paper holds that the expert assistant should be regulated by judicial administrative organs supplemented by the people＇s courts.
出处
《中国司法鉴定》
2014年第1期6-11,共6页
Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
关键词
有专门知识的人
专家辅助人
鉴定意见质证
people with specialized knowledge
expert assistant
cross-examination of expert opinion
