期刊文献+

基于扎根理论的互动式患者参与患者安全理论框架构建的研究 被引量:78

Study on the theoretical framework of patient participation in patient safety:agrounded theory study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探索患者对参与患者安全管理的感知和过程。方法运用格拉泽传统扎根理论方法论,对34例出院或即将出院的患者进行半结构式深度访谈,并收集、分析部分网络媒体的相关报道,析取主题。结果析出主题"互动式患者参与患者安全"的8个类属,并据此构建理论框架,包括"决策性、照护性、诉求性"3个参与策略,"信任、信息、沟通、支持"4个原因要素,"有利"1个参与结果,7个相关理论假设。结论互动式参与患者安全的理论框架可引导患者据其不同临床情境,采取积极"照护性参与"、审慎"决策性参与"、理性"诉求性参与"的恰当策略,对促进患者参与患者安全管理的研究及实践具指导意义。 Objective To investigate what's the patients' perception of patient safety and how do they engage in patient safety in hospital care. Methods A qualitative research approach guided by grounded theory was adopted. Data were collected by using a semi-structured deep interview on 34 discharged patients and compensatory analysis of media reports. Results Eight categories in the theme of interactive involvement in patient safety were contract- ed and eventually contributed to the development of a theoretical framework of patient participation in patient safe- ty. Three strategies of patient involvement in patient safety including decisive involvement,caring involvement and complaining involvement in patient safety,four influence factors including patient-provider trust,medical information support,conmmnication between patient and professionals,and support both from family and professionals were con- cluded. Benefit for patients is the ultimate outcome for patient involvement in safety. Seven hypotheses were drawn. Conclusions The theoretical framework of patient participation in patient safety can guide the patients to take proper strategies in different clinical situations such as participating in caring involvement actively,participating in decisive involvement carefully and participating in complain involvement rationally.
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期645-649,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
基金 世界卫生组织患者安全国际招标课题资助(编号:HQPSP1003898) 国家自然科学基金面上项目资助(编号:71073169)
关键词 扎根理论 安全管理 模型 理论 Grounded theory Safety Manaqement Models, Theoretical
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety. Forward programme2008-2009[M ]. Geneva : WHO Press, 2008 : 1-10.
  • 2WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety. Summary of the evi- dence on patient safety:implications tbr research [ M ]. Geneva: WHO Press,2009 : 1-5.
  • 3WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety. London declaration: patient for patient [ M ]. Geneva : WHO Press, 2006 : 1.
  • 4WHO.WHO patient safety research:better knowledge for safer care [ M ]. Geneva : WHO Press, 2009 : 1-20.
  • 5中国医院协会.关于发布和实施《2009年度患者安全日标》的通知[S/OL].[2010-09-19].http://www.cha.org.cn/plus/view.php?aid=7400.
  • 6叶旭春,刘朝杰,刘晓虹.患者参与患者安全的策略及其影响因素的研究概况与展望[J].中华现代护理杂志,2010,16(35):4217-4220. 被引量:27
  • 7丁力,姜安丽,叶旭春.患者安全相关问题的国外研究现状[J].解放军护理杂志,2007,24(4):55-56. 被引量:91
  • 8Glaser BG. Doing grounded theo:Issues and discussion [M]. Mill Valley,Califonfia Sociology Press, 1998:1-254.
  • 9格拉泽.扎根理论研究概述:自然呈现与生硬促成[M].费小冬,译.美国加州:社会学出版社,2009:5-108.
  • 10Johnstone MJ,Kanitsaki 0. Engaging patients as safety part- ners:some considerations for ensuring a culturally and lin- guistically appropriate approach [J ]. Health Policy,2009,90: 1-7.

二级参考文献79

共引文献209

同被引文献678

引证文献78

二级引证文献412

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部