期刊文献+

单次静注右美托咪定对保留自主呼吸七氟烷麻醉唇腭裂手术患儿苏醒期的影响 被引量:38

Effect of single-dose dexmedetomidine on recovery profiles after sevoflurane anesthesia with spontaneous respiration in pediatric patients undergoing cleft lip and palate repair
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价单次静注右美托咪定对保留自主呼吸七氟烷麻醉唇腭裂患儿苏醒期的影响.方法 选择2013年10-12月间在温州医科大学附属第二医院择期先天性唇腭裂修补术患儿60例,随机数字表法分为右美托咪定组(D组)和对照组(C组),每组30例.七氟醚全凭吸入麻醉诱导和维持,术中保留自主呼吸.D组于手术结束前30 min静脉泵注右美托咪定0.5μg/kg 10 min,C组泵入等量生理盐水.观察与记录两组患儿麻醉诱导前(T0)、右美托咪定给药前(T1)、给药完成时(T2)、给药后5 min(T3)、给药后10 min(T4)、术毕(T5)、拔管即刻(T6)、入PACU 5 min(T7)、术后1 h(R)的心率、平均动脉压(MAP)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)、呼吸频率、潮气量(VT)、呼气末二氧化碳浓度(PET CO2)、拔管时间及PACU滞留时间、拔管后的呛咳评分、PACU内的镇静镇痛评分及芬太尼的补救量、不良事件的发生情况.结果 与T0比较,两组T1 ~ T5心率、MAP下降(P<0.05),T6心率、MAP升高,C组明显高于D组(P<0.05).两组各时点呼吸频率、SpO2、VT和PET CO2的组间比较差异均无统计学意义.D组苏醒期呛咳和躁动发生率(30%和13.3%)均低于C组(66.7%和56.7%,P<0.05),PACU滞留时间短于C组[(15±6)比(23±19) min,P<0.05],芬太尼补救量少于C组[(0.8±2.1)比(4.9±6.5) μg,P<0.05].两组拔管时间、不良事件发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(均P >0.05).结论 单次静注右美托咪定可有效减少苏醒期躁动及呛咳发生,提高唇腭裂患儿七氟烷麻醉苏醒期的质量. Objective To explore the effect of single-dose dexmedetomidine on recovery period after sevoflurane anesthesia with spontaneous respiration in pediatric patients undergoing cleft lip and palate repair.Methods A total of 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Ⅰ-Ⅱ pediatric patients undergoing cleft lip and palate repair from October to December 2013 were randomly divided into groups D and C (n =30 each).Dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (group D) or an equal volume of normal saline (group C) was ad ministered intravenously over a period of 10 min at 30 min before the end of surgery.Anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane under spontaneous ventilation.Heart rate,mean arterial pressure (MAP),hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2),respiratory rate,tidal volume (VT) and pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) were recorded at the time before induction (T0),30 min before the end of surgery (T1),20 min before the end of surgery (T2),15 min before the end of surgery (T3),10 min before the end of surgery (T4),the end of surgery (T5),extubation (T6),5 min after transferal into post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (T7),1 h after surgery (T8),extubation time,length of PACU stay,fentanyl consumption and adverse events were all recorded.The incidence and severity of coughing and emergence agitation were assessed.Results Compared to T0,MAP and heart rate at T1 to T5 all decreased in two groups (P 〈 0.05).MAP and heart rate at T6 both increased in two groups and group C was higher than group D (P 〈0.05).No inter-group differences existed in SpO2,respiratory rate,VT or PETCO2.The incidence of coughing and emergence agitation (30% and 13.3%),fentanyl consumption of group D (0.8 ±2.1 μg) were all significantly lower than that of group C [(66.7% vs 56.7%) and (4.9 ± 6.50) pg,P〈0.05].Length of PACU stay in group D was shorter than that in group C [(15 ±6) vs (23 ± 19) min,P 〈 0.05].No inter-group difference existed in extubation time or adverse events.Conclusion A single intravenous dose of dexmedetomidine is effective in reducing emergence agitation and coughing,shortening length of PACU stay and improving the quality of recovery period after sevoflurane anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cleft lip and palate repair.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第19期1466-1469,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 右美托咪定 麻醉苏醒期 唇腭裂 麻醉 Dexmedetomidine Anesthesia recovery period Cleft lip and palate Anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Mason KP, Lerman J. Dexmedetomidine in children: current knowledge and future applications[ J]. Anesth Analg,2011,113 : 1129 -1142.
  • 2Tobias JD, Berkenbosch JW. Initial experience with dexmedetomidine in paediatric-aged patients [ J ]. Paediatr Anaesth ,2002,12 : 171-175.
  • 3Schmidt AP, Valinetti EA, Bandeira D, et al. Effects of preanesthetic administration of midazolam, clonidine, or dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain and anxiety in children [J]. Paediatr Anaesth ,2007 ,17 :667-674.
  • 4Cravero JP, Beach M, Thyr B, et al. The effect of small dose fentanyl on the emergence characteristics of pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia without surgery [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2003, 97:364-367.
  • 5盖春安,朱智瑞,胡智勇,蒋一蕾.七氟烷与瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚在小儿唇腭裂修补术中的麻醉效果[J].中华医学杂志,2013,93(23):1819-1821. 被引量:34
  • 6Politis GD, Frankland MJ, James RL, et al. Factors associated with successful tracheal intubation of children with sevoflmaneand no muscle relaxant[ J]. Anesth Analg,2002,95:615-620.
  • 7Milic'M, Goranovic T, Knezevic'P. Complications of sevoflurane- fentanyl versus midazolam-fentanyl anesthesia in pediatric cleft lipand palate surgery: a randomized comparison study [ J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2010,39:5-9.
  • 8Pestieau SR, Quezado ZM, Johnson Y J, et al. High-dose dexmedetomidine increases the opioid-free interval and decreases opioid requirement aftertonsillectomy in children [ J ]. Can Anaesth ,2011,58:540-550.
  • 9Guler G, Akin A, Tosun Z, et al. Single-dose dexmedetomidine reduces agitation and provides smooth extubation after pediatric adenotonsillectomy [ J ]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2005,15:762-766.
  • 10徐颖怡,宋兴荣,林植民,张国强,张娜.右美托咪啶用于婴幼儿唇腭裂修复术苏醒期的镇静效应[J].中华医学杂志,2012,92(13):878-881. 被引量:19

二级参考文献22

  • 1Steyn MP, Quinn AM, Gillespie JA, et al. Tracheal intubation without neuromuscular block in children. Br J Anaesth, 1994,72 : 403 406.
  • 2Cole JW, Murray DJ, McAllister JD, et al. Emergence behaviour in children: defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anaesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth, 2002,12:442447.
  • 3Politis GD, Frankland M J, James RL, et al. Factors associated with successful tracheal intubation of children with sevoilurane and no muscle relaxant. Anesth Analg, 2002,95:615-620.
  • 4Kwak FIJ, Kim JY, Min SK, et al. Optimal bolus dose of alfentauil for successful tracheal intubation during sevoflurane induction with and without nitrous oxide in children. Br J Anaesth, 2010,104:628-632.
  • 5Park KS, Park SY, Kim JY, et al. Effect of remifentanil on tracheal intubation conditions and haemodynamics in children anaesthetised with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2009,37:577-583.
  • 6Siddik-Sayyid SM, Taha SK, Aouad MT, et al. Propofol 2 mg/kg is superior to propofol 1 mg/kg for tracheal intubation in children during sevoflurane induction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2011,55 : 535-538.
  • 7Aouad MT, Yazbeck-Karam VG, Mallat CE, et al. The effect of adjuvant drugs on the quality of tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants in children: a systematic review of randomized trials. Paediatr Anaesth, 2012,22:6164526.
  • 8Oberer C, yon Ungern-Sternberg BS, Frei FJ, et al. Respiratory reflex responses of the larynx differ between sevoflurane and propofol in pediatric patients. Anesthesiology, 2005,103: 1142- 1148.
  • 9Gore MS, Harnagale KD. Evaluation of lntubating Conditions with Varying Doses of Propofol without Muscle Relaxants. J Anaesthesiol Chn Pharmacol, 20 l 1,27 : 27-30.
  • 10Morgan JM, Barker I, Peacock JE, et al. A comparison of intubating conditions in children following induction of anaesthesia with propofol and suxamethonium or propofol and remifentanil. Anaesthesia, 2007,62 : 135-139.

共引文献51

同被引文献264

引证文献38

二级引证文献218

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部