期刊文献+

PADUA评分系统与保留肾单位手术中相关问题的研究 被引量:3

PADUA nephrometry scoring system in nephron-sparing surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨PADUA评分系统在保留肾单位手术(NSS)中与手术时间、热缺血时间、并发症等相关因素的关系。方法:回顾性分析127例次行NSS的124例肾肿瘤患者的临床资料,行PADUA评分,并利用χ2检验、Fisher确切检验等分析PADUA评分与手术时间、热缺血时间、并发症、出血量、术后住院时间、术后第1天血肌酐变化率的关系。结果:PADUA评分低、中、高度复杂肿瘤分别为40例、62例、25例,LNSS组手术时间与PADUA评分有关(P=0.012),ONSS组只有高度与低度复杂肿瘤之间有统计学意义(P=0.005)。对于低度复杂肿瘤,LNSS比ONSS手术时间短(P=0.009)。PADUA评分与热缺血时间相关,与围手术期并发症、术后第1天血肌酐变化率无关。ONSS组出血量与PADUA评分无关,而LNSS组两者有关(P=0.031)。LNSS组高度比低度复杂肿瘤术后住院时间长。结论:PADUA评分与NSS手术时间、热缺血时间等相关因素密切相关,可以预测手术相关结果,指导肾肿瘤的治疗。 Objective:To explore the relationship between PADUA scoring system and the relevant factors of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) including operative time, warm ischemia time, complications and others. Method: Retrospective analysis of 127 NSS for 124 renal cancer patients was taken. Using χ2 test, Fisher exact test we ana- lyzed relationship between PADUA score and the relevant factors of NSS including operative time, warm ischemia time, complications, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, the rate of change in postoperative first-day serum creatinine. Result.. PADUA score low, medium and high complexity tumors were 40 cases, 62 cases, 25 cases re- spectively. Operation time of LNSS group was related to PADUA score (P= 0. 012). In ONSS group, only low and high complexity tumors were statistically different (P= 0. 005). For low complexity tumor, operative time of LNSS was shorter than ONSS (P=0. 009). PADUA score was related to warm ischemia time, but not related to complications and the rate of change in postoperative first-day serum creatinine. PADUA score had nothing to do with blood loss in ONSS group while they are related in LNSS group (P=0. 031). Postoperative hospital stay of highly complex tumor was longer than low grade tumors in LNSS group. Conclusion:PADUA score is closely relat- ed to operative time, warm ischemia time and other relevant factors of NSS. Thus we can predict the results of surgery and guide treatment of renal cancer .
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2014年第6期518-522,共5页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 肾肿瘤 PADUA评分系统 保留肾单位手术 renal tumor PADUA scoring system nephron-sparing surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Campbell S C, Novick A C, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass [J]. J Urol,2009,182:1271-1279.
  • 2Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative As- pects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PAD- UA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery[J]. Eur Urol, 2009,56:786-796.
  • 3Weight C J, Larson B T, Fergany A F, et al. Ne- phrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associ- ated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cTlb 1'e- hal masses[J]. J Urol,2010,183..1317-1323.
  • 4Hew M N, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K, et al. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the RENAL nephrometry score in patients undergo- ing partial nephrectomy[J]. J Urol, 2011, 186(1): 42 -46.
  • 5Okhunov Z, Rais B S, George A K, et al. The com- parison of three renal tumor scoring systems C-Index, P. A. D. U. A. , and R. E. N. A. L. nephrometry scores [J]. J Endourology, 2011, 25(12).. 1921-1924.
  • 6Sanli O, Tefik T, Mammadov A, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative observations may differ during lapa- roscopic nephron-sparing surgery[J]. J Endourology, 2011, 25(8): 1315-1821.
  • 7Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Amparore D, et al. Margins, ischaemia and complications rate after laparoscopic par- tial nephrectomy., impact of learning curve and tumour anatomical characteristics[J]. BJU Int, 2013, 112(8) : 1125-1132.
  • 8Becker F, Van Poppel H, Hakenberg O W, et al. As- sessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial ne- phrectomy[J]. Eur urol, 2009, 56(4): 625-635.
  • 9Buffi N, Lista G, Larcher A, et al. Margin, ischemia, and complications (MIC) score in partial nephrectomy: a new system for evaluating achievement of optimal outcomes in nephron-sparing surgery [J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(4): 617-618.
  • 10Mottrie A, Schatteman P, De Wil P, et al. Validation of the preoperative aspects and dimensions used foran anatomical (PADUA) score in a robot-assisted partial nephrectomy series[J]. World J urol, 2011: 1-6.

同被引文献37

  • 1韩精超,纪志刚,李汉忠.肾癌伴腔静脉瘤栓的诊治进展[J].中国医学科学院学报,2010,32(1):128-131. 被引量:12
  • 2孔玉祥,范松青,张宇新,等.人体局部解剖学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:171.
  • 3Ficarra V, Novara U, Secco S, et al. Preoperative Aspects and Dimen- sions Used fro" an Anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal turnouts in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery [ J]. Eur Urol,2009 ,56 :786-796.
  • 4Vasudevan A, Davies RJ, Shannon BA, et al. Incidental renal tu- mous:the frequency of benign lesions and the role of preoperative core biopsy[ J]. BJU Int, 2006 ;97:946-949.
  • 5Peycelon M, Hupertan V, Comperat E,et al. Longterm outcomes after nephron sparing surgery for renal cell careinoma latger than 4cm [J]. J Urol,2009,181:34-41.
  • 6Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Bertolo R, et al. Does tumour aize really affert the safety of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy [ J ]. BJU Int, 2010,2 : 1464-1469.
  • 7Weight C J, Larson BT, Fergany AF, et al. Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardio- vascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cTlb renal masses[ J]. J Urol,2010,183:1317-1323.
  • 8Tarzamni MK, Nezami N, Radshid RJ, et al. Anatomical differences in the right and left renal arterial patterns[ J]. Folia MoFphol( Ear- sz) ,2008,67:104-107.
  • 9Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU Guidelines on Re- nal Cell Carcinoma:The 2010 Update[ J]. Eur Urol,2010,58:398-406.
  • 10Nohara T, Fujita H, Yamamoto K, et al. Modified anatrophic partial nephrcctorny with selective renal segmental artery clamping to re- serve renal function : A preliminary lport. Int J Urol,2008,15:961- 966.

引证文献3

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部