摘要
目的探讨比较氧驱动雾化吸入与压缩泵雾化吸入治疗支气管哮喘的临床效果。方法选取本院收治的支气管哮喘急性发作患者100例,随机分为两组,分别采用氧气驱动雾化吸入与压缩泵雾化吸入治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果两组患者治疗3 h后临床总有效率差异无统计学意义,治疗后心率、呼吸频率、血氧浓度、最大呼气量均显著改善,氧驱动雾化吸入组心率与呼吸改善更显著。结论氧气驱动与压缩泵雾化吸入均能够有效治疗支气管哮喘,改善患者的呼吸与心率等体征,而氧气驱动改善患者体内状况更有优势。
Objective To observe and compare the clinical efficacy of oxygen atomizing inhalation and compressor pump atomizing inhalation treating bronchitical asthma. Methods 100 cases with bronchitical asthma treated in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups.Two groups were treated with oxygen atomizing inhalation and compressor pump atomizing inhalation respectively.The clinical effect of two groups were compared. Results There was no evident difference for clinical effective rate 3 hours after treatment between two groups.And the heart rate,respiratory rate,blood oxygen concentration and maximal expiratory volume of two groups improved evidently.And the heart rate and respiration of the group of oxygen atomizing inhalation improved more evidently. Conclusion Both oxygen atomizing inhalation and compressor pump atomizing inhalation can effectively treat bronchitical asthma and improve the respiration and heart rate of the patients.But oxygen atomizing inhalation has advantages of improving the signs of patients.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2014年第17期87-89,共3页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
雾化吸入
支气管哮喘
疗效
不同雾化方式
Clopidogrel
Danshen powder injection
Chronic brain insufficiency of blood
Efficacy
