期刊文献+

Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Availability and Fault Detection Capability Comparison Between BeiDou and GPS 被引量:4

Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Availability and Fault Detection Capability Comparison Between BeiDou and GPS
原文传递
导出
摘要 This paper used the statistical methods of quality control to assess receiver autonomous integrity monitoring(RAIM) availability and fault detection(FD) capability of BeiDou14(Phase II with 14 satellites),BeiDou(Phase III with 35 satellites) and GPS(with 31 satellites) for the first time. The three constellations are simulated and their RAIM performances are quantified by the global, Asia-Pacific region and temporal variations respectively. RAIM availability must be determined before RAIM detection. It is proposed that RAIM availability performances from satellites and constellation geometry configuration are evaluated by the number of visible satellites(NVS, NVS > 5) and geometric dilution of precision(GDOP, GDOP < 6) together. The minimal detectable bias(MDB) and minimal detectable effect(MDE) are considered as a measure of the minimum FD capability of RAIM in the measurement level and navigation position level respectively. The analyses of simulation results testify that the average global RAIM performances for BeiDou are better than that for GPS except global RAIM holes proportion. Moreover, the Asia-Pacific RAIM performances for BeiDou are much better than that for GPS in all indexes. RAIM availability from constellation geometry configuration and RAIM minimum FD capability for BeiDou14 are better than that for GPS in Asia-Pacific region in all cases, but the BeiDou14 RAIM availability from satellites are worse than GPS's. The methods and conclusions can be used for RAIM prediction and real-time assessment of all kinds of Global Navigation Satellite Systems(GNSS) constellation. This paper used the statistical methods of quality control to assess receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) availability and fault detection (FD) capability of BeiDou14 (Phase II with 14 satellites), BeiDou (Phase III with 35 satellites) and GPS (with 31 satellites) for the first time. The three constellations are simulated and their RAIM performances are quantified by the global, Asia-Pacific region and temporal variations respectively. RAIM availability must be determined before RAIM detection. It is proposed that RAIM availability performances from satellites and constellation geometry configuration are evaluated by the number of visible satellites (NVS, NVS 〉 5) and geometric dilution of precision (GDOP, GDOP 〈 6) together. The minimal detectable bias (MDB) and minimal detectable effect (MDE) are considered as a measure of the minimum FD capability of RAIM in the measurement level and navigation position level respectively. The analyses of simulation results testify that the average global RAIM performances for BeiDou are better than that for GPS except global RAIM holes proportion. Moreover, the Asia-Pacific RAIM performances for BeiDou are much better than that for GPS in all indexes. RAIM availability from constellation geometry configuration and RAIM minimum FD capability for BeiDou14 are better than that for GPS in Asia-Pacific region in all cases, but the BeiDou14 RAIM availability from satellites are worse than GPS's. The methods and conclusions can be used for RAIM prediction and real-time assessment of all kinds of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) constellation.
出处 《Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong university(Science)》 EI 2014年第3期313-324,共12页 上海交通大学学报(英文版)
基金 the National High Technology Research and Development Program(863)of China(No.2011AA120503)
关键词 Global Navigation Satellite Systems(GNSS) BeiDou Navigation Satellite System(BDS) GPS receiver autonomous integrity monitoring(RAIM) AVAILABILITY fault detection(FD) quality control Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), GPS, receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM), availability, fault detection (FD), quality control
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1BDS-SIS-ICD-B1I-1.0, BeiDou navigation satellite system signal in space interface control document-open service signal b1I (version 1.0) [S].
  • 2TEUNISSEN P J G. Quality control and GPS [M]/ /TEUNISSEN P J G, KLEUSBERG A. GPS for geodesy. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1998.
  • 3TEUNISSEN P J G. Minimal detectable biases of GPS data [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 1998, 72(4): 236-244.
  • 4OCHIENG W Y, SHERIDAN K F, SAUER K, et al. An assessment of the RAIM performance of a combined Galileo/GPS navigation system using the marginally detectable errors (MDE) algorithm [J]. GPS Solutions, 2002, 5(3): 42-51.
  • 5VERHAGEN S. Performance analysis of GPS, Galileo and integrated GPS-Galileo [C]/ / ION GPS 2002. Portland, OR, USA: The Institute of Navigation, 2002: 2208-2215.
  • 6wo F, KUBo N, YASUDA A. Performance evaluation of GPS augmentation using Japanese Quasi-Zenith satellite system [J]. Earth Planets Space, 2004, 40(4): 1249-1260.
  • 7HEWITSON S, WANG J. GNSS receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) performance analysis [J]. GPS Solutions, 2006, 10(3): 155-170.
  • 8692-5720, Air force space command capstone requirements document for global position, velocity, and time determination capability (draft) [S].
  • 9WALTER T, ENGE P, BLANCH J, et al. Worldwide vertical guidance of aircraft based on modernized GPS and new integrity augmentations [J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2008, 96(12): 1918-1935.
  • 10GRATTON L, JOERGER M, PERVAN B. Carrier phase relative RAIM algorithms and protection level derivation [C]/ / Proceedings of the 2009 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation. Anaheim, CA, USA: The Institute of Navigation, 2010: 256-264.

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部