期刊文献+

我国地方政府转变社会治理方式:挑战、问题与对策 被引量:9

Challenges, Problems and Solutions to Social Administration Methods of Local Government in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国地方社会治理正面临着社会结构紧张、社会矛盾高发、新媒体快速发展和价值观多元化的严峻挑战。然而,长期以来我国地方政府传统的社会管理模式一直存在以刚性稳定、单向决策、行政管制、单一思维和运动式治理为特征的内在缺陷,忽视了现代社会治理中的动态调节、民主协商、法治手段、综合治理和制度变革。为此,我国地方政府必须从多个层面推进社会治理方式的转变:以"以人为本"的价值观为引领,创新社会治理的理念;以现代信息技术为支撑,构建社会治理的协同体系;以公民参与为突破口,建立民主协商机制;以改变干部的思维方式为切入点,创新社会治理的手段和方式;以透明化为着力点,强化社会治理方式转变的动力机制。 Our local social administration is facing with serious challenges such as intense social structure, frequent social conflicts, rapid development of new-media and diversified values. However, the long dominating traditional social administration of local governments has such inner defects as rigid stability, unilateral decision, administrational regulation, unilateral thoughts and "movement-type" administration. It neglects the dynamic adjustment, democratic consultation, legal administration means, comprehensive administration and systematic reform. Therefore, our local government should push the transition of social administration from multiple aspects: instruct the local government with people-oriented values; innovate the ideology of social administration; construct the cooperation system for social administration with the support of modern information technology; build democratic consultation mechanism with citizens' participation as the breakthrough; innovate means of social administration starting from changing government officials' thoughts; strengthen the motive mechanism for change of social administration means with focus on transparency.
作者 蒋俊杰
出处 《中国浦东干部学院学报》 2014年第2期123-129,共7页 Journal of China Executive Leadership Academy Pudong
基金 2013年国家社会科学基金重大项目"我国市级发展规划编制中的公众参与机制研究"(项目号:13&ZD176)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 地方政府 社会治理 制度化治理 公民参与 法治思维 民主协商 Local government social administration institutionalized administration citizen participation legal thinking democratic consultation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献27

  • 1郑杭生,郭星华.当代中国价值评判体系的转型[J].社会学研究,1995(5):10-17. 被引量:28
  • 2莫于川.中政府:我国城市政府组织法制的理性选择[J].现代法学,1995,17(2):19-25. 被引量:11
  • 3塞缪尔·亨廷顿.变化社会中的政治秩序[M].北京:三联书店,1989.44-46.
  • 4R·爱德华·弗里曼.战略管理:利益相关者的方法[M].上海:上海译文出版社.2006.37-39;58;133-159.
  • 5Can M.Alpaslan, Sandy E.Green, Lan L.Mitroff Corporate Governance in the Context of Crises: Towards a Stakeholder Theory of Crisis Management[J]. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2009, (17):;38-49.
  • 6胡建一,杨敏等.公共项目社会稳定风险分析与评估概论[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2011.58;101;136;157.
  • 7John Clayton Thomas, Theodore H.Poister. Thinking about Stakeholders of Public Agencies: The Georgia Department of Transportation Stakeholder Audit[J].Public Organization Review, 2009, (9):67-82.
  • 8Mark S.Reed, Anil Graves et aI.Whors In and Why?. A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis Methods for Natural Resource Management[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, (90): 1933-1949.
  • 9Emerson W.Mainardes, Helen Alves, Mario Raposo. Stakeholder Theory: Issues to Resolve[J]. Management Decision, 2011, (49):226-252.
  • 10于建嵘.压力维稳的政治学分析--中国社会刚性稳定的运行机制戡略与管理,2010(4).

共引文献263

同被引文献115

引证文献9

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部