期刊文献+

微创体外循环和常规体外循环下行二尖瓣手术的对比研究 被引量:4

Minimal invasive mitral surgery under minimal extracorporeal circulation comparative study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨微创体外循环(minimal extracorporeal circulation,MECC)心内直视二尖瓣手术的疗效。方法:90例二尖瓣病变需行二尖瓣置换(MVR)或二尖瓣成型(MVP)手术的患者随机分成两组。MECC组(A组)45例,手术采用右胸前外侧小切口,经股动脉、股静脉和上腔静脉插管,建立MECC,术中应用负压辅助静脉引流装置;常规组(B组)45例,采用正中纵劈胸骨,经升主动脉,上、下腔静脉插管建立体外循环。观察并记录两组体外循环(CPB)时间(min),主动脉阻断时间(min),术中出血量(ml),输血量(ml),尿量(ml),24 h胸腔引流量(ml),术后辅助呼吸时间(h),ICU停留时间(h),住院总费用(万元)和手术后并发症发生情况。结果:两组均无手术死亡。A组CPB时间、主动脉阻断时间明显长于B组(P<0.05);但A组术中失血量、围手术期输血量均明显少于B组(P<0.01);手术后24小时总引流量A组显著较B组少(P<0.01);A组术后呼吸机辅助时间、ICU停留时间均明显短于B组(P<0.01),A组住院期间的总费用也少于B组(P<0.01)。结论:MECC辅助下的MVR虽然增加了CPB时间、主动脉阻断时间,但创伤小、出血少、恢复快,切口美观,费用低,安全可靠,可能是未来心脏手术的发展趋势。 Objective:To compare the outcomes of minimal invasive mitral surgery under minimal extracorporeal circulation with those under conventional middle sternotomy. Methods:Ninety patients with mitral stenosis and/or insufficiency,who need mitral repair or replacement,were randomized into minimal invasive (Group A,45 cases,minimal right thoracotomy under minimal extracorporeal circulation,MECC) or conventional middle sternotomy (Group B,45 cases). The following items are recorded and then compared:cardiopulmonary bypass time,aortic cross clamp time,the amount of blood lose during surgery,blood transfusion,peri-operative chest drainage,time of intubation and ICU stay post-operation. Results:There were no major complications and operative death in both groups. Both CPB time and cross clamp time in group A were longer then in Group B (P 〈 0.05). But the bloods lose during surgery,the amount of chest drainage and blood transfusion peri-operatively were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B (P 〈 0.05,P 〈 0.01,P 〈 0.05,respectively). The intubation time and ICU stay after surgery were obviously shorter in group A than in group B (P 〈 0.05),with lower hospital cost in group A. (P 〈 0.01). Conclusion:Mitral surgery through mini-thoracotomy under MECC improves the quality of surgery on following aspects:trauma,lower blood lose and transfusion,recovery,cost-effective,cosmetic effect and patients satisfaction even with relative longer CPB and cross clamp times.
出处 《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期649-652,共4页 Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
关键词 微创 体外循环 二尖瓣手术 mitral surgery minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Habib RH, Zacharias A, Schw ann TA,et al. Adverse effects of low hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass in the aduh:should current practice be changed? [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2003,125 : 1438-1450.
  • 2Kirklin JK, Westaby S, Blackstone EH, et al. Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass as- sociated haemostatic abnormalities [J]. J Thorac Cardio- vasc Surg, 1998,66:1068-1072.
  • 3Yilmaz A,Rehman A,Sonker U,et al. Minimal access aortic valve replacement using a minimal extracorporeal circulatory system [J]. Ann Thorac Surg,2009,87(3): 720-725.
  • 4John A, Bennett M, Lloyd C, et al. Overcoming chal- lenges:the use of minimal extracorporeal circulation in Jehovah's Witnesses undergoing cardiac surgery [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2010, 139(6) :e122-123.
  • 5Yilmaz A,Sjatskig J,van Boven WJ,et al. Combined coro- nary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal closed circuit circulation ver- sus standard cardiopulmonary bypass [J]. Interact Cardio- vasc Thorac Surg,2010,11 (6) :754-757.
  • 6Fromes Y, Gaillard D,Ponzio O,et al. Reduction of the inflammatory response following coronary bypass grafting with total minimal ertracorporeal circulation [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2002,22 : 527-533.
  • 7Field ML,Al-Alal B,Mediratta N,et al. Open and chest extrathoracic cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass and extracorporeal life support : methods, indications, and out- comes [J ]. Postgrad Med J, 2006,82(967) : 323-331.
  • 8Anastasiadis K,Antonitsis P,Haidich AB,et al. Use of minimal extracorporeal circulation improves outcome after heart surgery;a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Int J Cardiol,2013,164 (2) : 158-169.
  • 9Ranucci M,Isgro G. Minimizing cardiopulmonary by pass: does it really change the outcome [J]. Crit Care,2007,11 (2) :R45-54.
  • 10Aklog L,Adams DH,Couper GS,et al. Technique and re- sults of direct-access minimally invasive valve surgery:a paradigm for the future [J]. Thorac Cardiovasic Surg, 1998,116(5) :701-715.

同被引文献41

  • 1刘迎龙.右侧胸外科小切口微创先天心脏病矫治手术.中国循环杂志,2000,15(4):211-211.
  • 2Sehmitto JD, Mlkashi SA, Cohn LH. Past, present, and future of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery [J]. J Heart Valve Dis, 2011,20(5): 493- 498.
  • 3Botta L, Cannata A, Brusehi G, et al. Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery [J]. Thorac Dis, 2013,5 (Suppl 6) : S686-$693.
  • 4Antunes MJ. Minimally invasive valve surgery: reality, dream or utopia ? [J]. J Heart Valve Dis, 1998,7 (4) :358- 359.
  • 5Grossi E, Galloway AC, LaPietra A, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery a 62 year experience with 714 patients [J]. Ann Thoracic Surg,2002,74(3) : 660-663.
  • 6Cosgrove DM, Sabik JF. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations [J ]. Ann Thorac Surg , 1996,62(2) :596.
  • 7Lawrence H, Pamela S, Jeffrey S, et al. Right thoraeotomy femoral bypass and deep hypot-hermia for re- replacement of t he mitral valve [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998, 48 ( 1 ) : 69.
  • 8Peter I, Richard W, Richard A, et al. Simplified method for reoperation on the mitral valve [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998, 48(6):835.
  • 9Aybek T, Dogan S, Risteski PS, et al. Two hundred forty minimally invasive mitral operations through right minithoracotomy [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006, 81(5) : 1618-1624.
  • 10Modi P, Rodriguez E, Hargrove WC 3rd,et al. Minimally invasive video- assisted mitral valve surgery:a 12- year, 2-center experience in 1178 patients [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2009, 137(6) : 1481-1487.

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部