摘要
97’刑法改变了用诈骗罪"包办"所有诈欺类行为的立法技术,将部分涉金融的诈骗犯罪单独设置一节。然而,同样是金融领域的诈骗犯罪,刑法却仅在集资诈骗罪、贷款诈骗罪以及恶意透支中明确规定了"非法占有目的"。即使如此,"非法占有目的"该是所有金融诈骗罪共有的主观超过要素,其中,除了信用证诈骗罪中的"骗取信用证"是短缩的二行为犯,其他类型均是断绝的结果犯。对于主观的超过要素,单纯使用司法推定的方法过于单薄与粗糙,文章通过"三破除,一反思,一肯定"的方式,提出证明"非法占有目的"需要"综合治理"。
Criminal law amended in 1997 changed with the crime of fraud of the ＂package＂ all fraud behavior of legislative technology and part of the involved financial fraud crime individually Settings section. However, only in fund-raising fraud, loan fraud and malicious overdraft, Criminal lawclearly stipulated in the ＂purpose of illegal possession＂. Even so, ＂purpose of illegal possession＂ is subjective element over objective in all financial frauds. Among them, in addition to the ＂to defraud a letter of credit＂ is completely consequential of fense, other types are incompletely two-conduct offense. For subjective element over objective, simply use the judicial presumption method is too thin and rough. In this paper, through the ＂three break, a reflection, a affirm＂, considers the proof of ＂purpose of illegal possession＂ needs ＂comprehensive control＂.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2014年第3期85-89,116,共6页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
非法占有
非法占用
主观超过要素
司法
推定
purpose of illegal, possessionIllegally, occupiedsubjective element over, objectivejudicial presumption
