期刊文献+

大学生权力感唤起的ERP研究

An ERP Study about Facial Expression Identification on College Students in Different Senses of Power Levels
下载PDF
导出
摘要 心理学研究中的权力被认为是一种权力感。权力感是一种对他人影响的知觉,在这一概念中权力被外部刺激唤起。研究选择行为反应和ERP技术相结合的手段,采用经过评定的、含有权力意义的动词和名词,唤起参与者的权力感。通过对参与者不同权力感水平下的脑电特点进行分析,探索权力感产生的神经机制,实现了权力感启动效果评估的精确性。研究发现,大学生对权力词汇词性涵义的加工过程迅速、自发,对于早期ERP正成分,名词诱发的EPP波幅比动词更大,EPP潜伏期在右侧额区比左侧额区更短;大学生高低权力词汇唤起的N300和N400波幅存在显著差异,与高权力词汇有关的脑电成分主要在左侧额区被唤起。 Power in psychological study is regarded as a sense of power, which is generally regarded as a kind of abil-ity to exercise influence upon others. The perception of power can be aroused by external stimuli. The present re-search combines selective behavioral responses and ERP technology, and adopts an assessment, which containsverbs and nouns containing the meaning of power to arouse the participants' sense of power. The identificationprocess analyzes the ERP features of individuals in different senses of power, and explore the neural mechanism ofthe origin of the sense of power to realize the accuracy of the assessment of the effects of the activated sense of pow-er. The main findings of the study are follows: a. College students process the connotations of related words rapidlyand spontaneously; in the early ERP wave of EPP, the wave of nouns is greater than that of verbs; compared withthe right frontal cortex, the incubation period of the left frontal cortex is even shorter; b. There exists a significantdifference between the N300 and N400 waves evoked by the high and low powerrelated words, brain activity areasthat are evoked by a high sense of power concentrated mainly in the left frontal lobes.
出处 《苏州科技学院学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第3期78-85,共8页 Journal of University of Science and Technology of Suzhou:Social Science
关键词 大学生 权力感 ERP college students sense of power ERP
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1韦庆旺,俞国良.权力的社会认知研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(6):1336-1343. 被引量:57
  • 2D. G. Winter & A. J. Stewart. The Power Motive[M]// H. London & J. Exner. Dimensions of Personality. New York : Wiley, 1978 : 391-447.
  • 3M. Weber. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization[M]. A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, trans. New York: Oxford University Press, 1947.
  • 4F. Lee & L. Z. Tiedens. Is it lonely at the Top? Independence and Interdependence of Power-holders[M]//B. M. Staw & R. I. Sutton . Research in Organizational Be havior: Vol. 23. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press,2001;43-91.
  • 5A. D. Galinsky, J. C. Magee, M. E. Inesi, D. H. Gruenfeld. Power and Perspectives not Taken[J]. Psychologi cal Science, 2006,17(12) : 1068-1074.
  • 6G. A. van Kleef, C. Oveis, I. van der Lowe, A. Lu- oKogan, J. Goetz & D. Kehner. Power, Distress, and Compassion: Turning a Blind Eye to the Suffering of Others[J]. Psychological Science, 2008,19(12): 1315-1322.
  • 7P. K. Smith & J. A. Bargh. Nonconscious Effects of Power on Basic Approach and Avoidance Tendencies[J]. Social Cognition, 2008,26 (1):1-24.
  • 8L. S. Hing, D. R. Bobocel, M. P. Zanna, M. V. McBride. Authoritarian Dynamics and Unethical Decision Making: High Social Dominance Orientation Leaders and High Right-wing Authoritarianism Followers[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007,92( 1 ) : 67-81.
  • 9李小平,杨晟宇,李梦遥.权威人格与权力感对道德思维方式的影响[J].心理学报,2012,44(7):964-971. 被引量:33
  • 10D. Keltner, D. H. Gruenfeld & C. Anderson. Power, Approach, and Inhibition [J]. Psychological Review, 2003,110(2): 265-284.

二级参考文献133

  • 1韦庆旺.(2008).权力差异和社会动机对谈判行为和结果的影响.博士学位论文.浙江大学.
  • 2Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.
  • 3Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
  • 4Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462--479.
  • 5Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power-sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
  • 6Berdahl, J. L., & Anderson, C. (2002). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 497-509.
  • 7Carver, C. S., Sutton, $. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741-751.
  • 8Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183-187.
  • 9Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-40.
  • 10Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory Control: A generative force behind power's far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502-508.

共引文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部