期刊文献+

PLIF和PLF术式联合椎弓根内固定系统治疗腰椎滑脱的临床研究

Clinical Study of PLIF and PLF Surgery Combined with Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation System as a Treatment for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究外侧植骨融合(post lateral lumbar-fusion,PLF)和后方椎间融合(post lunbar interbody fusion,PLIF)术式联合椎弓根内固定系统治疗腰间椎滑落的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2007年1月至2012年1月于我院治疗的71例腰椎滑脱患者,以数字法随机分为观察组(36例)和对照组(35例)。观察组患者行PLIF治疗,对照组行PLF治疗,比较两组治疗前后的JOA评分、手术时间以及失血量等指标。结果观察组手术时间显著高于对照组,失血量多于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);观察组患者术后2年滑脱率明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者术后1年融合率显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于治疗腰椎滑落,PLF与PLIF两种手术方式各有优势,PLF治疗方式具有手术时间短、出血量小的优点,而PLIF治疗方式内固定失败率低、融合率高,疗效更为明显。临床治疗中,可根据实际情况选择应用。 Objective To study the clinical effect of post lateral lumbar-fusion (PLF) and post lunbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery modes combined with pedicle screw internal fixation system in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods 71 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis treated in our hospital from January 2007 to January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed, and according to the digital method were randomly divided into the observation group (36 cases) and control group (35 cases). The observation group were treated with PLIF, and the control group with PLF, and JOA score, operation time and volume of blood loss between two groups before and after treatment were compared. Results The operation time of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, blood loss volume was higher than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P 〈0.05). The detachment rate at 2 years after operation of patients in the observation group, was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). The fusion rate of patients at 1 years after operation in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusions For the treatment of lumbar slide, each operation mode of PLF and PLIF has advantages, of which PLF has the advantages of shorter operation time, smaller hemorrhage volume , while PLIF treatment has advantages of lower failure rate ,higher fusion rate and more obvious effect. In clinical treatment, either of them can be selected according to the actual situation.
出处 《临床医学工程》 2014年第6期707-708,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
基金 清远市科技局项目(项目编号:2011B01112063)
关键词 腰椎滑脱 融合器 后外侧融合术 经后路椎体间融合 Lumbar spondylolisthesis Lumbar-fusion machine Post lateral lumbar-fusion Post lunbar interbody fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献83

  • 1张绍东,唐天驷,吴小涛,杨惠林,孙俊英,邱勇,谭远超.腰椎椎间融合器的翻修手术[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(9):530-533. 被引量:21
  • 2张绍东,吴小涛,茅祖斌,唐天驷,杨惠林,孔翔飞.后路腰椎椎间融合器融合术的并发症分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(7):493-497. 被引量:23
  • 3曹治东,李邦春,苟景跃,邓志龙,张奎,胡建华,田开熙,晏伟.经椎弓根植骨在伴有骨质疏松的胸腰椎骨折中的应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(6):421-423. 被引量:33
  • 4蔡维山,郭东明,刘恩志,钟波夫.后路可扩张型椎体间融合笼治疗退行性下腰椎不稳症[J].广东医学,2007,28(5):764-766. 被引量:4
  • 5MacNab I,Dall D.The blood supply of the lumbar spine and its application to the technique of intertransverse lumbar fusion.J Bone Joint Surg Br.1971;53:628-638.
  • 6Henley EN,David SM.Current concept review-Lumbar arthrodesis for the treatment of back pain.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1999;81:716-730.
  • 7McAfee PC.Current concept review-Interbody fusion cages in reconstructive operation on the spine.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1999;81:859-880.
  • 8Weiner BK,Fraser RD.Spine update lumbar interbody cages.Spine.1998;23:634-740.
  • 9Suk SI,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al.Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis.Spine.1997; 22:210-220.
  • 10Kozak JA,O'Brien JP.Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior fusion:An independent analysis of a treatment for the disabled low back pain patient.Spine.1990;15:4322-4328.

共引文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部