摘要
目的：比较纤维桩与铸造金属桩核在修复大面积牙体缺损的临床疗效。方法：回顾性分析2010年1月-2013年1月在我院口腔科进行修复治疗的120例患者（120颗患牙）的临床资料，随机将其分为两组各60例，实验组患牙给予纤维桩修复，对照组患牙给予传统铸造金属桩核修复，观察随访一年后比较两组患者的各项指标。结果：两组患者的桩核冠脱落、桩核折断、根折、牙龈炎症等方面比较，差异具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：纤维桩在修复大面积牙体缺损的预后如桩核冠脱落、桩核折断、根折等方面明显优于铸造金属桩，值得在临床上广泛应用。
Objective：To compare the fiber pile and cast metal post-and-core in repairing large defects of tooth of the clinical curative effect. Methods：A retrospective points in our dental restoration treatment of 120 patients （120 with tooth） clinical data, it can be divided into two groups at random each 60 cases, the experimental group suffer from tooth to provide fiber pile repair, the control group with teeth give traditional cast metal post-and-core repair, after one year follow-up observation indicators compared two groups of patients. Results：Two groups of patients, broken pile nuclear and root of post-and-core crowns, gum inflammation and so on comparison, difference has statistical significance （P〈0.05）. Conclusion：Fiber pile in to repair the prognosis of large tooth defect such as loss of post-and-core crowns, broken pile nuclear and root bends, etc is superior to the casting metal post, is widely used in clinic.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2014年第4期562-562,564,共2页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词
纤维桩
铸造金属桩核
牙体缺损
Fiber pile
Cast metal post-and-core
Tooth defect
