期刊文献+

经竖脊肌、多裂肌间隙入路手术内固定治疗退变性腰腿痛的临床研究

Clinical Studies of Fixation Surgery of Erector Spinae,Multifidus Gap Approach Treating Degenerative Low Back Pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经竖脊肌、多裂肌间隙入路手术内固定治疗退变性腰腿痛的临床效果,以便提高临床诊治水平。方法以收治的70例退变性腰腿痛疾病患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,各35例。对照组予以后路正中椎体融合术,观察组则予以经竖脊肌、多裂肌间隙入路融合术,比较两组治疗后的临床效果。结果两组在术中出血量、术后引流量、术后3个月的VAS评分、术后多裂肌MRI信号分级上比较有明显的差异性(P<0.05),有统计学意义。结论经竖脊肌、多裂肌间隙入路融合术可减轻脊柱后部肌肉损伤,加快恢复,近期临床效果满意。 Objective To investigate the clinical effects of fixation surgery of erector spinae,multifidus gap approach in the treatment of degenerative low back pain,in order to improve the level of clinical diagnosis and therapy. Methods 70 cases of degenerative low back pain were divided in-to control group and conservation group, each group with 35 patients. The control group was given middle posterior interbody fusion,the observation group was given fusion surgery by erector spinae, multifidus gap approach. Results There were significant differences in amount of bleeding, post-operative drainage volume, postoperative VAS score of three months, postoperative MRI signal classification of multifidus muscle (P〈0.05). Conclusion Erector spinae, multifidus gap approach can reduce spine back muscle injury,accelerate recovery. The clinical effect in short-term was sat-isfactory.
出处 《现代诊断与治疗》 CAS 2013年第16期3604-3606,共3页 Modern Diagnosis and Treatment
关键词 经竖脊肌 多裂肌间隙入路 退变性腰腿痛 椎体融合 By erector spinae,multifidus gap approach Degenerative low back pain diseases In-terbody fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1范顺武,方向前,赵兴,赵凤东,虞和君.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗下腰椎疾病[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(2):81-85. 被引量:54
  • 2Kim KT,Lee SH,Suk KS, et al. The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion[J].Spine, 2006,31(6) :712-716.
  • 3Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one-Level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach[J].Spine,2007,32(5):537-543.
  • 4Suk SI,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al. Adding posterior lumbar inter- body fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis[J].Spine, 1997,22(2) :210-220.
  • 5Blumenthal S,McAfee PC,Guyer RD,et al.A prospective,ran- domized,multicenter Food and Drug Administration investiga- tional device exemotions study of lumbar total disc replace- ment with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumnar fusion: part l:evaluation of clinical outcomes [J].Spine,2005,30(14): 1565-1575.
  • 6Danneels LA,Vanderstraeten GG,Cambier DC,et al. CT ima- ging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects[J].Eur Spine,2000,9(4):266-272.
  • 7Miura Y,Imagama S,Yoda M,et al. Is local bone viable as a source of bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine, 2003,28 (20) : 2386-2389.
  • 8Myles PS, Troedel S, Boquest M, et al. The pain visual analog scale: is it linear or nonlinear? [J]. Anesth Analg, 1999, 89(6): 1517-1520.
  • 9Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, et al. The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion [J]. Spine, 2006, 31(6): 712-716.
  • 10Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2006, 19 (2): 77-86.

共引文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部