期刊文献+

考虑社会责任的闭环供应链决策与协调 被引量:45

Decision-making and coordination in closed-loop supply chain with social responsibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究社会责任承担对闭环供应链决策和盈利性的影响,进而协调考虑社会责任承担的闭环供应链,构建了由单一制造商和单一零售商组成的闭环供应链,分别在集中决策和制造商作为Stackelberg博弈领导者的分散决策模式下研究了闭环供应链的定价、社会责任承担水平和回收率决策,进一步分析了社会责任承担效应对决策变量和利润的影响,探讨了两部定价契约和收入共享契约对分散决策下闭环供应链的协调作用,并通过算例进行论证。研究表明:与集中决策相比,分散决策存在利润损失,零售价、社会责任承担水平、回收率和供应链利润均与社会责任承担效应正相关,两部定价契约和收入共享契约均可实现闭环供应链的协调,而收入共享契约的灵活性更强。 To research the effect of social responsibility on decision-making and profitability of Closed-Loop Supply Chain (CLSC), and to coordinate the CLSC with social responsibility, a CLSC model consisting of one manufacturer and one retailer was constructed. Under centralized decision-making and decentralized decision-making with manufacturer leading Stackelberg game, the decisions of pricing, social responsibility investment and return rate were studied and compared respectively. The impact of social responsibility effect on decision variables and profits of CLSC system was analyzed. The coordination of two-part tariff contract and revenue sharing contract with decentralized decision CLSC was investigated. The numerical analysis was presented to demonstrate the conclusions, and the results showed that the total profit in decentralized decision-making was less than that in centralized decisionmaking, all decision variables and profits of the CLSC were positively correlated to social responsibility effect. The coordination of CLSC was achieved with two-part tariff contract and revenue sharing contract, while the revenue sharing contract was more flexible.
出处 《计算机集成制造系统》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期1453-1461,共9页 Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基金 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金资助项目(580-413007-0301) 科技部科技人员服务企业计划资助项目(2009GJA10039)~~
关键词 闭环供应链 社会责任 STACKELBERG博弈 两部定价契约 收入共享契约 closed-loop supply chain social responsibility Stackelberg game two-part tarif; contract revenue sharing contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1CARTER C R. JENNINGS M M. Social responsibility and supply chain relationships [J].Transportation Research Part E.2002.38(1) :37-53.
  • 2LEVIS J. Adoption of corporate social responsibility codes by multinational companies [J].Journal of Asian Economics. 2006.17 (1) : 50-55.
  • 3HSUEH C F. CHANG M S. Equilibrium analysis and corporate social responsibility for supply chain integration[J].European Journal of Operational Research. 2008 .1900) : 116-129.
  • 4CRUZ J M. Dynamics of supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decisionmaking[J].European Journal of Operational Research. 2008. 184(3): 1005-1031.
  • 5CRUZ J M. Modeling the relationship of globalized supply chains and corporate social responsibility[J].Journal of Cleaner Production. 001: 10. 1016/j. jclepro, 2011. 09. 013.
  • 6NI Debing , LI K W. TANG Xiaowo. Social responsibility allocation in two--echelon supply chains: Insights from wholesale price contracts[J].European Journal of Operation Research. 2010.207(3) : 1269-1279.
  • 7NI Debing , LI K W. A game-theoretic analysis of social responsibility conduct in two--echelon supply chains[J].International Journal of Production Economics. 2012. 138(2): 303-313.
  • 8郭春香,李旭升,郭耀煌.社会责任环境下供应链的协作与利润分享策略研究[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(2):103-108. 被引量:49
  • 9杨玉香,周根贵,刘文东.基于企业社会责任的闭环供应链网络协调问题[J].计算机集成制造系统,2011,17(9):1997-2004. 被引量:16
  • 10龚浩,郭春香,李胜.基于消费者偏好的供应链社会责任内在动力研究[J].软科学,2012,26(12):45-49. 被引量:18

二级参考文献111

共引文献338

同被引文献308

引证文献45

二级引证文献321

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部