期刊文献+

清代康定锅庄:一种讨论汉藏关系的历史路径 被引量:18

Guozhuang in the Qing Dynasty:An Historical Path for Discussing Han-Tibetan Relationship
原文传递
导出
摘要 清代康定边茶贸易,及其衍生出的锅庄,使得康定在如下三个面向符合波兰尼的"贸易港"概念特征:第一,边茶贸易是晚期帝国管理和保护下的汉藏共同体之间的外部贸易;第二,中央王朝实施的土司制度奠定了康定的"准中立性"特征;第三,锅庄贸易延续并强化了共同体间的接触禁忌。基于传统中国之历史格局,康定在如下意义上又具备超越性:首先是康定实质上也兼具帝国内部贸易的意涵,并且表征了帝国的道德秩序;其次,接触禁忌试图保护的是汉藏双方的内部整合性;最后,土司及其锅庄贵族共同构成的系统,其中立性之维持,端赖于从政治、经济、亲属制度等诸方面建构与汉藏双方的关系,从而使土司地区成为汉藏缓冲地带,也使汉藏之间成为一道不可分割的连续光谱。考察清代康定锅庄贸易,可以为处理当代汉藏关系提供历史的洞见。 Tea trade and the tea-trade-derivative Guozhuang in the Qing Dynasty made Kangding a trading hub whose characteristics fit well with Polanyi's conception of'port of trade'. First,tea trade was an external trade between Han and Tibetan communities administered and protected by the late empire. Second,the appointed headman system instituted by the central dynasty helped fashion the quasi-neutrality of Kangding. Third,tea trade in Guozhuang carried forward and strengthened the touch prohibition between the two ethnic communities. Thanks to the historical pattern of traditional China,Kangding distinguished itself in the following three ways. First,tea trade in Kangding was as much an internal trade within the empire as it was external,and it embodied the moral order of the empire. Second,the touch prohibition was an attempt to protect the internal integrity of both Han and Tibetan communities. Lastly,the system composed by the headman and the aristocracy of Guozhuang depended for the perseverance of its neutrality on political,economic and kinship factors as well as the relationship between Han and Tibetan communities. In this way,the region under the jurisdiction of the headman became the buffer zone between Han and Tibetan communities,making the two ethnic communities a continuous and inseverable spectrum. A study of tea trade in Guozhuang in the Qing Dynasty may provide some historical insight into how the Han-Tibetan relationship should be handled.
作者 郑少雄
出处 《开放时代》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期12-23,5,共12页 Open Times
关键词 锅庄 汉藏关系 贸易港 经济人类学 Guozhuang,Han-Tibetan relations,port of trade,economic anthropology
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1曾文琼,杨嘉铭.打箭炉锅庄考略[J].西藏研究,1989(4):14-21. 被引量:17
  • 2吴吉远.清代打箭炉城的川藏贸易的产生和发展[J].中国边疆史地研究,1994,4(3):67-74. 被引量:15
  • 3《乾隆雅州府志》.
  • 4《西藏研究》编辑部(编):《明实录藏族史料》第1集,拉萨:西藏人民出版社1982年版,第158页.
  • 5张且(整理):《康定城的建立与变迁》,载康定县志办(编印):《炉城风物》第8期,1984年11月.
  • 6马戎:《2l世纪的中国是否存在国家分裂的风险(上)》,共识网,http://www.21ccom-net/ar“(·les/.gyj/ggzh1/article一2011041333510.html,2013年12月1日访问.
  • 7萨林斯:《整体即部分:秩序与变迁的跨文化政治》,刘永华译,载王铭铭(主编):《中国人类学评论》第9辑,北京:世界图书出版公司2009年版,第127页.
  • 8刘仕权:《康定四十八家锅庄》,载康定县政协(编):《康定县文史资料选辑》第2辑,第19页.
  • 9《打箭炉厅同知王典章劝告茶商演说》,载赵心愚、秦和平[编]:《清季民国康区藏族文献辑要》上册,第37-38页.
  • 10刘仕权:《解放前康定商业简述》,载政协四川省甘孜藏族自治州委员会(编):《甘孜州文史资料》第8辑,1989年版,第137页.

共引文献31

同被引文献123

引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部