期刊文献+

关节松动术结合体外冲击波治疗肩周炎的疗效观察 被引量:41

Therapeutic effects of mobilization combined with extracorporeal shock wave treatment on patients with scapulohumeral periarthritis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察关节松动术结合体外冲击波治疗肩周炎的疗效。方法:70例肩周炎患者随机分为观察组和对照组各35例。2组均采用关节松动术治疗,观察组加用体外冲击波治疗。治疗前后采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评定疼痛,并评定肩关节疼痛与功能障碍指数(SPADI)及临床疗效。结果:治疗1及2个疗程后,2组患者VAS评分均较治疗前显著降低,且同时段观察组评分更低于对照组(均P<0.05)。治疗2个疗程后,2组SPADI亚量表及总评分均较治疗前明显降低(P<0.05),且观察组更低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组有效率明显高于对照组(94.3%、77.1%,P<0.05)。结论:关节松动术结合体外冲击波治疗肩周炎疗效显著,值得临床进一步推广、应用。 Objective :To observe the efficacy of mobilization combined with extracorporeal shock wave treatment in patients with scapulohumeral periarthritis .Methods :Seventy patients were divided into observation group and control group randomly(n=35 each) .Both groups received mobilization treatment ,and observation group given extracorporeal shock wave treatment additionally .Two groups were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ,shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) and clinical effects before and after treatment .Results :After one and two courses of treatment ,the VAS scores in both groups were decreased obviously as compared to pretreatment ,more significantly in observation group than in control group(all P〈0 .05) .After two courses of treatment ,the SPADI scores in both groups were decreased obviously as compared to pretreatment (P〈0 .05) ,more significantly in observation group than in control group(P〈0 .05) .The clinical effective rate in observation group was significantly higher than in control group(94 .3% vs .77 .1% ,P〈0 .05) .Conclusion :Mobilization combined with extracorporeal shock wave treatment can alleviate the pain of patients with scapulohumeral periarthritis ,and the technique was worth expanding .
出处 《中国康复》 2014年第3期192-194,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation
关键词 关节松动术 体外冲击波 肩周炎 肩关节疼痛与功能障碍指数 mobilization extracorporeal shock wave scapulohumeral periarthritis SPADI
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Kuijpers T,Windt DA, Heijden GJ, et al. Systematic re- view of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders [J]. Pain, 2004,109(3):420- 431.
  • 2Berghs BM, Sole:Molins X, Bunker TD. Arthroscopic re- lease of adhesive capsulitis[J] J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2004,13(2) : 180- 185.
  • 3H engeveld E, Banks K, English K, Hengeveld E. Maidand 's peripheral manipulation [M]. 5th ed. Elsevier/Butter- worth Heinemann, 2005,29-33.
  • 4Romeo P, Lavanga V, Pagani D, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders: a review[J]. Med Princ Pract, 2014,28 (1) : 7-13.
  • 5中华医学会.临床诊疗指南物理医学与康复分册[M].北京:人民卫生社,2005:170.
  • 6Roach KE, Budiman Mak E, Songsiridej N, et al. Develop ment of a shoulder pain and disability index[J], Arthritis Care Res, 1991,4(4) : 143-149.
  • 7陈雯,阳芸.运动疗法结合推拿治疗对肩周炎患者肩关节功能的影响[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2012,34(1):76-77. 被引量:18
  • 8Bicer A, Ankarali H. Shoulder pain and disability index= avalidation study in Turkish women[J]. Singapore Med J, 2010,51(11) :865-870.
  • 9Martins J, Napoles BV, Hoffman CB, et al. The Brazilian version of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: translation, cultural adaptation and reliability[J].Rev Bras Fisioter, 2010,14(6) :527 -536.
  • 10Angst F, Goldhahn J, Pap G, et al. Cross-cultural adapta- tion,reliability and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) [J]. Rheumatology, 2007, 46(1) :87-92.

二级参考文献31

共引文献80

同被引文献330

引证文献41

二级引证文献336

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部