摘要
Taking the judicial practice and legislative attempts of two internet-developed regions,the U.S. and Europe,as the background,the authors of the article analysis the application of traditional concepts such as “minimum contacts”,“fair competition and substantive justice” and “purposeful availment” in IT disputes.Besides,the authors also discuss the advantage and disadvantage of jurisdiction approaches based on some new principles of “country of origin” and “home jurisdiction”.
Taking the judicial practice and legislative attempts of two internet-developed regions,the U.S. and Europe,as the background,the authors of the article analysis the application of traditional concepts such as “minimum contacts”,“fair competition and substantive justice” and “purposeful availment” in IT disputes.Besides,the authors also discuss the advantage and disadvantage of jurisdiction approaches based on some new principles of “country of origin” and “home jurisdiction”.
出处
《环球法律评论》
2001年第1期43-51,共9页
Global Law Review
