摘要
本文报告56例颈椎管扩大术,单开门颈椎管扩大术50例,双开门颈椎管扩大术6例。治疗多发性椎间隙颈椎病19例、后纵韧带骨化症(简称OPLL)18例,OPLL合并颈椎外伤3例.颈椎管狭窄合并OPLL2例,发育性颈椎管狭窄症14例。术后一个月和一年分别评估疗效,均明显优于以往的椎板减压术。
Here are 56
cases treated by two kinds of cervical spinal tube expansion method,referred as uni-lateral
methed(in 50 cases)and bilateral method in 6 cases);The total example include:
multi-focalcervical intervertebral spacc disease(19 cases), ossification of posterior longitudinal
ligament (OPLL)(16 cases), OPLL complicated with cervical trauma(3 cases),cervical spinal
tube narrrowing compli-catetJ with OPLL( 2 cases),developmental cervical spinal tubc
narrrowing(14 cases).Evaluated at lmonth and l year seperately results with this technique are
more favorable,compaved with laminecto-my for decompression.Effect is determined by spinal
pathological change itself,while age course ofillniss,choice of anestnesia method can also
influence in certain degree. The reasons why l year prog-nosis is worse than l month prognosis
remain unkown.
出处
《颈腰痛杂志》
1995年第1期17-19,共3页
The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
关键词
颈椎管狭窄症
颈椎管扩大术
颈椎病
cervical spinal tube narrowing
cervical spinal tube expansion.