摘要
本文分析了SCI作为科研成果评价标准所存在的局限性 ,认为由于伪引、漏引、引用率在学科间的不可比较性、来源期刊地域分布不平衡、语言障碍、以及存在着大量引用率与质量不一致的情况等原因 ,简单绝对地使用SCI作为科研成果的主导性评价标准 ,存在很多局限性 ,因而也可能造成诸多不可靠的评价结论 。
The article discussed the limitations of SCI as an appraising standard in scientific and technological research results in China.Because of false citation,missing citation,language barrier,incomparable citation rate among different fields,imbalanced terrain distribution of source periodicals,as well as existence of many instances on citing rate inconsistent with quality,SCI may lead to unreliable conclusions as the only appraising standard.Finally,the article raised some suggestions about improving the measure of research results.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第11期41-47,共7页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
