摘要
目的 :对比穴位刺激调控法与氯丙咪嗪治疗强迫症的疗效。方法 :15例强迫症采用穴位刺激调控法 ,2 0例采用氯丙咪嗪进行为期 8周的治疗 ,并采用 Y- BOCS、汉密尔顿量表 (HAMD)、副反应量表(TESS)及通用的临床疗效评定方法对其临床疗效及副反应进行评定。结果 :穴位刺激调控组平均起效时间 1～ 2周 ,显效率 73% ,Y- BOCS减分率 5 1.32 % ,HAMD减分率 5 3.5 % ;氯丙咪嗪组平均起效时间3～ 4周 ,显效率 70 % ,Y- BOCS减分率 4 8.2 1% ,HAMD减分率 5 7.74 %。两组疗效无显著差异 (P>0 .0 5 )。结论 :穴位刺激调控法治疗强迫症是一种安全可靠的方法 ,值得临床推广。
Objective:To Observe the therapeutic efficacy difference of point stimulation regulation and anafranil in treating obsession. Methods:15 obsession cases were treated with point stimulation while another 20 cases were treated with anafranil for 8 weeks followed by the evaluation of the clinical efficacy and side effects by using Y BOCS, HAMD, TESS and other routinely used methods. Results:In the point stimulation group, the effect began after 1 to 2 weeks of treatment with the total effective rate of 73%, Y BOCY reduced by 51.32%, HAMD reduced 53.5%; while in the anafranil group, it was 3 to 4 weeks, with the total effective rate of 70%,Y BOCY reduced by 48.21%, HAMD reduced 57.74%. No difference was observed between the 2 groups. Conclusions:Point stimulation was effective in treating obsession and worth to be extended in clinical.
出处
《浙江中西医结合杂志》
2001年第10期609-610,共2页
Zhejiang Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
