期刊文献+

道德伪善的教育学思考 被引量:9

Educational Thought on Moral Hypocrisy
原文传递
导出
摘要 教育学对道德伪善少有研究,而心理学关注心理事实,将道德伪善理解为道德声称与道德行为之间的不一致,失之于宽;伦理学在道德伪善研究上贡献颇多,但将不同形态、类型的道德伪善都定性为道德恶,失之于严。道德伪善的研究,需要教育学视野。在教育学视野下,所想、所言、所行的不一致不一定是道德伪善,只有加上欺骗性的不一致才是道德伪善。教育学对道德伪善的关注不仅关注其概念,还关注其形成的内外条件;不仅关注个人性的道德伪善,还关注机构性的道德伪善。关于道德伪善的教育学思考,有与心理学、伦理学研究不同的意义,包括以积极的眼光去看人、从内外不一致中发现教育的契机、从道德伪善中看到道德的力量、从道德伪善形成的内外条件中找到教育努力的方向等。 Education has little research on moral hypocrisy,while psychological research is not strict enough as it focuses on psychological facts,and considers moral hypocrisy as the inconsistency between moral claim and moral behavior.Although ethics has contributed a lot to the study of moral hypocrisy,it is so strict that it characterizes various forms of moral hypocrisy as moral evil.The study of moral hypocrisy needs the vision of education.From the perspective of education,the inconsistency among what we think,what we say,and what we do is not necessarily moral hypocrisy,if not combining deception.Education is concerned not only with the concept of moral hypocrisy,but also with its internal and external conditions.It not only pays attention to the moral hypocrisy of the individual,but also to the institution.The educational reflection on moral hypocrisy is different from psychology and ethics,including taking a positive view to see others,finding educational opportunities from internal and external inconsistencies,seeking the strength of morality from moral hypocrisy,and finding the direction of educational endeavor from the inside and outside conditions of moral hypocrisy.
作者 高德胜 GAO Desheng(Institute of Curriculum and Instruction,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062,China)
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第11期28-43,共16页 Global Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"生活德育的理论深化与实践推进研究"(项目编号:16JJD880027)的阶段性成果
关键词 道德伪善 道德行为 教育学 moral hypocrisy educational thought significance
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献83

  • 1万俊人.论和谐社会的政治伦理条件[J].道德与文明,2005(3):4-7. 被引量:49
  • 2寇彧,徐华女.论道德伪善——对人性的一种剖析[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,20(6):56-61. 被引量:15
  • 3倪梁康.论伪善:一个语言哲学的和现象学的分析[J].哲学研究,2006(7):91-95. 被引量:26
  • 4黄萍.伪善判定与次序效应的研究[J].绥化学院学报,2006,26(6):180-181. 被引量:2
  • 5Onora O' Nell:Towards Justice and Virtue-A collective account of practical reasoning, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • 6[美]朗·富勒.《法律的道德性》.郑戈译.商务印书馆,2005年版,第28页.
  • 7Festinger, L. (1957).认知失调理论(郑全全译).杭州:浙江教育出版社.
  • 8Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, states of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1, pp. 45-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 10Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 330-339.

共引文献64

同被引文献49

引证文献9

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部