摘要
《民法总则》未明确界定财产权,但列举了物权、债权及一系列其他财产权,由此产生了如何解释财产权的问题。传统物债二分的财产权结构存在局限性,财产权的重新体系化是必要、合理且可行的。结合历史、哲学和现实基础,财产权应是:主体对具有直接经济价值的利益所享有的,基于法律规定或相对人约定产生的,以该利益的归属或利用为内容的固有权利。其范畴包括《民法总则》中列举的物权、具有金钱价值的债权、知识产权、股权和其他投资性权利、继承权,以及可以通过其他法律确认的虚拟财产权、商品化权、特许经营权等。依据体系化的标准,财产权首先应分为普通财产权和特殊财产权。普通财产权可分为有形财产权和无形财产权,特殊财产权可以分为身份性财产权和特许性财产权。
In the General Provisions of the Civil Law, there is a list of the real right, the creditor's rights and a series of other property rights, but no positive definition of property rights. There is a limitation in the traditional structure of the property rights, and the Re-systematization of the property right is necessary, reasonable and feasible. Combined with historical, philosophical and realistic basis, the property rights should be : the right, based on legal provisions or counterparty agreement, about the attribution or use of inherent interests with direct economic value. The categories include the property rights listed in the General Provisions, such as the claims of money, intellectual property, equity and other investment rights, inheritance rights, and the rights can be stipulated by other laws, such as virtual property rights, commercialized personality, franchise right. According to the system of the standard, the property rights in the first level should be divided into ordinary property rights and special property rights. Ordinary property rights are divided into tangible property and intangible property rights. Special property rights are divided into property right of identity and property right of special permission.
作者
田土城
王康
TIAN Tu-cheng;WANG Kang(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450000China)
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第12期53-64,共12页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
财产权
物债二分
体系化
普通财产权
特殊财产权
property rights
the binary system of real rights and creditor's rights
systematization
ordinary property right
special property right
