期刊文献+

“一带一路”倡议的开放性 被引量:8

On the Openness of the Belt and Road Initiative
原文传递
导出
摘要 “一带一路”倡议是我国改革开放四十年历程的逻辑产物及改革开放进入新阶段的时代需求。开放性是“一带一路”的根本属性,既体现了倡议的价值指向与核心理念,也折射出习近平外交思想的世界主义情怀。其现实逻辑包括理念根基、路径支撑和价值目标三个维度。“一带一路”坚持开放包容,是一个文明交融、义利相济、制度兼容的跨区域开放性大框架;“一带一路”倡导开放合作,致力于打造包含互联互通新体系、金融合作新平台、国际关系新理念、全球治理新方案等要素的新型国际公共产品;“一带一路”着眼于开放发展,是改革开放的自然结果、深化改革开放的内生需求和开放发展理念的国际化呈现,体现了历史经纬、现实需求与未来愿景的交汇统一。 The Belt and Road Initiative(BRI)is seen to be the logic product of reform and opening-up either in the entire course of forty years or in the new era, The openness, the essential property of BRI, embodies its core values, and the cosmopolitan sentiments of Xi Jinping’s diplomatic thoughts as well. The realistic logic of BRI consists of three dimensions—its ideational basis, implementation path and value objective. Firstly, BRI is an open and inclusive cross-regional framework of civilization integration, complementation of benefits and obligations, and institution coordination. Secondly, BRI advocates open cooperation and provides an open international public goods with a new system of interconnection and interoperability, a new platform for international financial cooperation, a new concept of international communication and a new plan of global governance. Thirdly, BRI can be regarded as the continuation and the natural consequences of deepening reform and opening up, reflecting the intersection and unification of historical context, realistic demands and future prospect of China.
作者 汪长明 Wang Changming
出处 《国际观察》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期28-42,共15页 International Review
基金 2017年度上海市哲学社会科学规划“三大系列”研究项目“钱学森系统工程思想及当代价值——对中国航天成功经验的总结与推广”(项目编号:17Z2017040004)的阶段成果
关键词 “一带一路” 开放性 改革开放 人类命运共同体 The Belt and Road Initiative Openness Reform and Opening-up Community of Shared Future for Mankind
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献23

  • 1林毅夫.贫困、增长与平等:中国的经验和挑战[J].中国国情国力,2004(8):4-5. 被引量:10
  • 2王文.联合国发展机制评析[J].外交学院学报,2001(4):45-49. 被引量:3
  • 3KAUL I,CONCEI P.GOULVEN K L,RONALD U,MENDOZA.Managing Globalization[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2003.
  • 4CHASEK,PAMELA S.A Comparative Analysis of Multilateral Environmental Negotiations[M].Group Decision and Negotiations,1997:7 -61.
  • 5SANDLER,TODD.Global and Regional Public Goods:A Prognosis for Collective Action[J].Fiscal Studies,1998 (3):221 -247.
  • 6PRUITT,DEAN.Negotiation Behavior[M].New York:Academic Press,1981.ARNESON,RICHARD.Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare[J].Philosophical Studies,1989(56):77 -93.COHEN,GERALD.Equality of What? On Welfare,Goods,and Capabilities[M]//NUSSBAUM M,SEN A.The Quality of Life.Oxford:Clarendon Press,1993.
  • 7MITCHELL,RONALD B.Intentional Oil Pollution at Sea:Environmental Policy and Treaty Compliance[M].Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1994.
  • 8SHUE,HENRY.The Unavoidability of Justice[M]//HURRELL A,KINGSBURY B.The International Politics of the Environment.Oxford:Clarendon Press,1992.
  • 9JONQUIERES D,GUY.All Night Haggling in Doha Ends in Agreement[J].Financial Times,2001(11).
  • 10MIKESELL,RAYMOND F.The BrettonWoods Debates:A Memoir[M].Princeton University,International Finance Section,Princeton,N.J.1994:35-36.

共引文献1531

同被引文献83

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部