期刊文献+

考虑不同退货原因的易逝品库存模型 被引量:1

Optimal Inventory Model for Deteriorating Items with Different Types of Customer Returns
原文传递
导出
摘要 首次构建了考虑不同退货原因的混合销售模式下的易逝品退货模型,然后以订购量、销售期和仓储技术投资额为决策变量,求解出了存在仓储技术投资下与不存在仓储技术投资额下模型的最优解。通过对结果的数值分析,发现投资仓储技术可以大幅度增加零售商的利润,并做了敏感性分析,最后拓展了未来的研究方向。文章对企业易逝品的退货管理具有重要意义。 For the first time,this paper constructs a return model of perishable goods under mixed sales mode considering different reasons for returns.We determine the optimal order quantity,replenishment cycle,and preservation technology investment with and without considering preservation investment.Then,the numerical examples are presented,the results show that the retailer can make a great difference with investment in preservation.In the end,we give some future researches.This paper give management managerial insights in the amount of preservation investment for returnable and deteriorating items.
作者 杨宽 曾双立 冯君莲 张东 YANG Kuan;ZENG Shuang-li;FENG Jun-lian;ZHANG Dong(College of Business Administration,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China)
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第7期84-90,共7页 Systems Engineering
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划项目(17YJA630119) 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(12JJ5032)
关键词 退货 易逝品 仓储技术投资 Returnable Items Deteriorating Preservation Investment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献85

  • 1陈荣.预期后悔与体验后悔在消费者动态选择过程中的作用机制[J].南开管理评论,2007,10(3):29-34. 被引量:19
  • 2Hess, J. D., Chu, W., Gerstner, E.. Controlling Product Returns in Direct Marketing. Marketing Letters, 1996, 7(4): 307-317.
  • 3Wood, S. L.. Remote Purchase Environments: The Influence of Return Policy Leniency on Two-stage Decision Processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 2001, 38(2): i57-169.
  • 4Dowling, G. R., Staelin, R.. A Model of Perceived Risk and In- tended Risk-handling Activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 1994, 21(1): 119-134.
  • 5Hetts, J. J., Boninger, D. S., Armor, D. A., Gleicher, F., Nathan- son, A.. The Influence of Anticipated Counterfactual Regret on Behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 2000, 17(4): 345-368.
  • 6Ketzenberg, M. E., Zuidwijk, R. A.. Optimal Pricing, Ordering, and Return Policies for Consumer Goods. Production and Op- eration Management, 2009, 18(3): 344-360.
  • 7Petersen, J. A., Kumar, V.. Are Product Returns a Necessary Evil? Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 2009, 73(3): 35-51.
  • 8Bechwati, N. N., Siegal, W. S.. The Impact of the Prechoice Process on Product Return. Journal of Marketing Research, 2005, 42(3): 358-367.
  • 9Janakiraman, N., Ord6fiez, L.. Effect of Effort and Deadlines on Consumer Product Returns. Journal of Consumer Psycholo- gy, 2012, 22(2): 260-271.
  • 10Anderson, E. T., Hansen, K., Simester, D.. The Option Value of Returns: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Marketing Science, 2009, 28(3): 405-423.

共引文献56

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部