摘要
宏观的社会公正与法律公正,是历史的,更是现实的。法律公正一般表现为抽象原则,而具体个案的公正标准有相对性。当事人的体感公正,就是其切身感受。而社会公众体认的法律公正,需通过个案公正去展现,以成为看得见的正义。这样,法律公正与个案公正就应有一致性,但它们又并非始终一致,而时有差异。法律公正是底线标准,是一致性与差异性的对立统一。案件侦办、法庭审判、修法调整,都需与时俱进,其倾向性与公正性的动态平衡,贵在依法创新。公安司法人员要努力而为,才能使之保持平衡。有了微观公正与宏观公正的相对统一,才能大幅提升广大群众的"体感正义"。
Macro social justice and legal justice are historical and realistic.Legal justice generally manifests itself as an abstract principle,and the fairness criteria of specific cases are relative.For the litigant,the sense of justice is their personal experience.For the public,The legal justice recognized needs to be demonstrated through fair cases and become visible justice.In this way,legal justice and case justice should be consistent,but sometimes there are differences,the standard of legal justice is the unity of opposites between consistency and difference.Case investigation,court trials ,regulations and revision of laws must all advance with the times,and their dynamic balance of inclination and impartiality should be innovated according to the law.Public security and judicial personnel must work hard to maintain balance.With the relative unity of micro-fairness and macro-justice ,it is possible to substantially enhance the"sense justice"of the masses.
作者
陈闻高
Wengao Chert(Sichuan Police College,Luzhou Sichuan 646000)
出处
《警学研究》
2018年第5期104-111,共8页
Police Science Research
关键词
良法
执法
案件侦办
公正
宏观
微观
good law
law enforcement
Case Investigation
justice
micro
macro
