期刊文献+

颈椎前路界面固定和带锁钢板固定的远期疗效比较研究 被引量:9

A Comparative Study of Long-term Results of Interface Fixation (Cage) and AO Locking Plate in Anterior Cervical Vertebra Fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨颈前路手术中用界面内固定 (Cage)和AO带锁钢板内固定远期疗效。方法  91例经颈前路减压 ,自体植骨 ,采用界面固定 47例 ;AO带锁钢板固定 44例。结果  91例中 ,77例获得随访 ,其中界面固定 42例 ,颈椎带锁钢板内固定 35例。平均随访 1 4个月 ,两组病例植骨于术后 1 2~ 1 6周骨性愈合。术后恢复之椎间高度未发生再丢失现象 ,颈椎生理曲度维持良好。两组疗效无显著性差异。结论 界面固定和带锁钢板固定对颈椎前路手术术后可能导致的潜在性颈椎失稳进行内固定 。 Objective To compare the long-term results of cervical spinal locking plate and interface fixation cage in anterior fusion.Methods Ninety-one cases of cervical diseases were treated by anterior decompression, auto-bone grafe,cervical spine interface fixation cage or AO locking plate.Results Seventy-seven cases were followed-up (Forty-two cases were fixed with interface fixation (CAGE), thirty-five cases were fixted with AO locking plate). The average period of follow-up was 11 months. Two group cases had showed solid interbody fusion in 15 to 19 weeks. Intervertebral spaces were restored after operation. The physiological curve of the cervical spine was good. There was no significant difference between two groups in results of treatment.Conclusion It is the best long-term result to fix the cervical vertebras from anterior with interface fixation cage or AO locking plate.
出处 《骨与关节损伤杂志》 2002年第1期14-16,共3页 The Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
关键词 内固定 颈椎骨折 脊髓型颈椎病 颈椎前路界面固定 带锁钢板固定 远期疗效 比较研究 Cervical vertebras Anterior Internal fixator Long-term results
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献14

共引文献129

同被引文献53

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部