摘要
姚小鸥《洛道五丈渡汲水》一文 ,已背离了正常的学术争鸣与批评。该文对赵逵夫先生关于《公莫舞》的研究作了严厉指责 ,谓其“抄袭”、“剽窃”杨公骥先生的研究成果。但事实却并非如此。本文从《公莫舞》的研究史 ,赵、杨研究的比较 ,以及赵文的贡献与其所遵循的学术规范等方面 ,对该文予以反驳 ,并论及其在学术批评方面的缺失。
The article,Crossing the Jishui River along the Five-zhang-wide Road to Luoyang,written by YAO Xiao-ou,has deviated from the normal academic contention and criticism.It is in this composition that Mr. ZHAO Kui-fu is severely accused of his research on Gong Mo Wu,his findings being denounced as'borrowing indiscriminately from','plagiarizing'Mr.YANG gong-ji's achievements in research.But this is not true.The present article is going to refute those accusations in that article of YAO's with evidence in the history of research into Gong Mo WU,with a comparison between ZHAO-s and YANG-s researches,ZHAo-s contribection to scientific research on the subject,and the academic norm to be observed,etc.,and in addition,to deal in general with the state of being in want of academic crilicism,etc..
出处
《西北师大学报（社会科学版）》
北大核心
2002年第3期24-30,共7页
Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词
《公莫舞》
研究史
学术批评
学术规范
Gong Mo Wu
history of research
academic criticism
academic norm
