劳动合同对农民工收入的影响机制研究——基于内生转换回归模型的实证分析被引量：14

Research on the Influence Mechanism of Labor Contracts on Migrant's Income:An Empirical Analysis Based on Endogenous Switching Regression Model

原文传递

导出

摘要是否签订劳动合同,不仅是法律意识问题,也是经济决策问题。现有研究往往忽略工资决定中的不可观测因素和选择性偏误,导致错误估计工资方程以及劳动合同的异质性边际回报,也无法深入探讨劳动合同对工资收入的影响途径。本文利用修正选择性偏误的内生转换回归模型,同时估计农民工的工资方程和劳动合同的选择方程。研究发现,仅在签订劳动合同组,教育水平、技能和法律意识才能提高农民工工资收入,劳动合同能够降低性别歧视;年轻、城市户籍、有技能证书和法律知识的农民工更倾向于选择签订劳动合同。签订劳动合同的边际回报存在很强的异质性,它是一条向下倾斜的曲线,最大为0.152,最小为-0.072。平均来看,农民工签订劳动合同能够增加3.78%的工资收入。 Taking the heterogeneous marginal returns into account, this article applies endogenous switching regression model to correct selection bias and looks into the mechanism of which labor contract affects the migrants＇ wage. We find that signing labor contracts does not necessarily increase migrants＇ wage income. Only those who signed labor contracts will benefit from education, labor skills and law knowledge. What＇s more, labor contract is helpful to eliminate sex discrimination, and it is a cost-benefit analysis process to sign contract. The migrants of young, with urban register, training certificates and law knowledge are more likely to sign labor contracts. Besides, substantial heterogeneity is found among individual marginal returns of labor contracts signing. The marginal returns vary and the curve of MTE is downward sloping. In average, signing labor contract can bring 3. 78% in crease in income.

作者才国伟刘冬妍

机构地区中山大学岭南学院

出处《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期54-64,共11页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71372146) 教育部人文社科规划项目(13YJA790001) 广东省自然科学基金项目(S2012010010630) 广东省优秀青年教师培养计划中山大学优秀青年教师培养计划(14wkpy44)的资助

关键词劳动合同工资收入边际回报影响机制 labor contract heterogeneous marginal return endogenous switching model selection bias

分类号 D412.6 [政治法律—国际共产主义运动] F124.7 [经济管理—世界经济] F323.6 [经济管理—产业经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1徐道稳.劳动合同签订及其权益保护效应研究——基于上海等九城市调查[J].河北法学,2011,29(7):13-25. 被引量：12
2刘林平,雍昕,舒玢玢.劳动权益的地区差异——基于对珠三角和长三角地区外来工的问卷调查[J].中国社会科学,2011(2):107-123. 被引量：86
3陈祎,刘阳阳.劳动合同对于进城务工人员收入影响的有效性分析[J].经济学（季刊）,2010,9(1):687-712. 被引量：68
4Mincer, J., Schooling, Experience and Earnings, New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.
5Heckman, J. , J. L. Tobias and E. Vytlacil, Four Parame- ters of Interest in the Evaluation of Social Programs, South- ernEconomic Journal, 2001, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 211- 223.
6Willis, R.J. , and S. Rosen, Education and Self-Selection, Journal of Political Economy, 1979, Vol. 87, pp. 7-36.
7Carneiro, P. , J.J. Heekman, and E.J. Vytlaeil, Estima- ting Marginal Returns to Education, American Economic Review, 2011, Vol. 101, No. 6, pp. 2754-2781.
8McFadden, D. , Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, In Paul Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers of E- conometrics, New York: Academic Press, 1974, pp. 105- 42.
9Aakvik, A. , J.J. Heckman and E. J. Vytlacil, Estimating Treatment Effects for Discrete Outcomes when Responses to Treatment Vary: An Application to Norwegian Vocational Rehabilitation Programs, Journal of Econometrics, 2005, Vol. 125, No. 1, pp. 15-51.
10Lokshin, M. and Z. Sajaia, Maximum Likelihood Estima- tion of Endogenous Switching Regression Models, Stata Journal, 2004, Vol. 4, pp. 282-289.