期刊文献+

罗马契约的构成分析及其意义

Component of Roman Contract and It′s Significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 罗马契约法是一种形式契约体系,其契约在结构上可以分为内在的协议与外在形式两个方面,而契约的效力便在于当事人协议与外在合法形式的结合。在罗马契约发展史上,契约法经历了从注重形式到注重协议的转变过程,但形式契约体系并未瓦解。历史环境的变化,造成了我们对罗马契约制度的众多误解。对罗马契约结构的分析,有利于判定契约的效力,认定契约的属性,厘清契约之间的区别与联系,最终有助于我们正确处理西方法律的移植问题。 Rome contract law is a formal contract system. The structure of its contracts can be divided into intrinsic agreements and extrinsic forms. The enforceability of contracts lies in integration of two elements above. Although contracts have undergone changes from a focus on the forms to agreements in the history of Rome, the formal system of contract did not collapse. Historical changes rint that there are some mistakes in our understandings of the Rome contract. Analysis of the structure of the Roman contract is conducive to determine the validity of contracts, identify the distinction and connection between contracts, and ultimately help us to correctly deal with the issue of legal transplant.
作者 王华胜
出处 《华北电力大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第3期55-59,共5页 Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
基金 中国法学会2013年度部级法学研究课题(项目编号:CLS2013D140)
关键词 罗马契约法 形式主义 意志理论 契约自由 法律移植 roman contract law formalism will theory freedom of contract legal transplant
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[美]艾伦·沃森 李静冰.民法法系的演变及形成[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992..
  • 2[美]孟罗·斯密 姚梅镇.欧陆法律发达史[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999..
  • 3H. F. Jolowicz, Barry Nicholas. Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
  • 4W. W. Buckland. A Text-Book of Roman Law: From Augustus to Justinian [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1921:410--411.
  • 5Andrew Stephenson. A History of Roman Law with a Commentary on the lnstitues of Gaius and Justinian [ M]. Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1912:165.
  • 6Alan Watson. The Evolution of Law: The Roman System of Contracts[J]. Law and History Review, 1984 (1).
  • 7W. H. Buckler. The Origin and History of Contract in Roman Law[M]. London: C. J. Clay and Sons, 1895 : 181,146, 184, 158, 161, 189.
  • 8Paul Collinet. The Evolution of Contract as Illustrating the General Evolution of Roman Law [J]. Law Quarterly Review, 1932(48).
  • 9[意]桑德罗·斯奇巴尼 丁玫 译.契约之债与准契约之债[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998.323.
  • 10Charles Henry Monro. The Digest of Justinian, Vol. 1 [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1904 : 108.

二级参考文献12

共引文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部