摘要
目的比较分析舒芬太尼和芬太尼术后镇痛的临床效果。方法选取2012年5月至2014年5月我院收治的100例择期手术患者,依据随机数字表法将这些患者分为两组,即舒芬太尼组(50例)和芬太尼组(50例)。然后对两组患者镇痛后4、8、12、24、48 h的镇痛效果及不良反应发生情况进行评价比较。结果舒芬太尼组患者镇痛术后4、8、12、24、48 h视觉模拟评分均明显比芬太尼组低(P<0.05);舒芬太尼组患者的不良反应发生率4%(2/50)明显比芬太尼组32%(16/50)低(P<0.05)。结论舒芬太尼比芬太尼更能显著降低患者的视觉模拟评分及不良反应发生率,术后镇痛的临床效果显著,值得推广。
ObjectiveTo compare and analyze the clinical effects of sufentanil and fentanyl for postoperative analgesia.Methods100 cases of elective surgery patients in our hospital from May 2012 to May 2014, these patients were divided into two groups according to a random number table, namely, sufentanil group （50 cases） and fentanyl group （50 cases）. Then analgesic effect after analgesic and the occurrence of adverse 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 h of the two groups of patients were evaluated and compared.ResultsThe visual analog pain scores after 4, 8,12, 24, 48 h of the sufentanil group were signiifcantly lower than the fentanyl group （P〈0.05）; the incidence of adverse reactions of the sufentanil group 4% （2/50） was signiifcantly lower than fentanyl group 32%（16/50） （P〈0.05）.ConclusionSufentanil can reduce patients’ visual analog scale and incidence of adverse reactions more signiifcantly than fentanyl, the clinical effect of postoperative analgesia is signiifcantly, so is worthy of promotion.
出处
《中国医药指南》
2014年第20期50-51,共2页
Guide of China Medicine
关键词
舒芬太尼
芬太尼
术后镇痛
临床效果
比较分析
Sufentanil
Fentanyl
Postoperative analgesia
Clinical results
Comparative analysis
