期刊文献+

5种反应介质对垃圾渗滤液污染地下水的治理效果研究 被引量:2

Research on Treatment on Groundwater Pollution by Landfill Leachate Using 5 Reaction Mediums
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了研究PRB技术修复垃圾渗滤液污染地下水的可能性,筛选最佳反应介质及其配比,为城市垃圾渗滤液污染地下水的治理提供参考,选择零价铁粉、膨润土、沸石、活性碳、炉渣5种反应介质,研究其对垃圾渗滤液污染地下水的治理效果。结果表明:5种反应介质单独作用下,活性炭对地下水中的COD去除效果最好,去除率达到76.0%,沸石对COD去除效果最差,去除率仅为45.0%,但沸石对地下水中NH3的去除效果最好,去除率为70.8%,零价铁对NH3的去除效果最差,去除率为42.3%;选择零价铁、活性炭、沸石3种介质按照不同配比继续试验,得出对COD的去除效果以零价铁:活性炭:沸石=2:2:1的比例最好,其次是1:2:2和2:1:2,对NH3的去除效果以零价铁:活性炭:沸石=1:2:2的比例最好,其次是2:1:2和2:2:1。 In order to research the possibility of repairation of groundwater polluted by landfill leachate by PRB, the author researched on treatment on groundwater polluted by landfill leachate using zero-valent iron, bentonite, zeolite, activated carbon and slag. The results showed that: treatment to COD with activated carbon was the best, which the removal rate reached to 76.0%. Treatment to COD with zeolite was the worst, which the removal rate was only 45.0%. However, treatment to NH3 with zeolite was the best, which the removal rate reached to 70.8%. Treatment to NH3 with zero-valent iron was the worst, which the removal rate was only 42.3%. Experiment continued with zero valent iron, activated carbon and zeolite in different proportioning. It concluded that treatment to COD with zero valent iron, activated carbon and zeolite in 2:2:1 was the best, and then was 1:2:2 and 2:1:2. Treatment to NH3 with zero valent iron, activated carbon and zeolite in 1:2:1 was the best, and then was 2:1:2 and 2:2:1.
出处 《中国农学通报》 CSCD 2014年第20期197-201,共5页 Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
基金 滨州学院科研基金项目"PRB技术在修复垃圾渗滤液污染地下水中的应用研究"(BZXYG1108) 滨州学院重大课题"黄河三角洲地区环境与经济协调发展对策"(2010ZDL04)
关键词 5种反应介质 垃圾渗滤液 地下水 治理 5 reaction mediums landfill leachate groundwater treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1周仰效,李文鹏.地下水水质监测与评价[J].水文地质工程地质,2008,35(1):1-11. 被引量:87
  • 2罗兰.我国地下水污染现状与防治对策研究[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2008,8(2):72-75. 被引量:183
  • 3Richard T W,Robert W P,Guy W S.Long-term performance of permeable reactive barriers using zero-valent iron:geochemical and microbiological effects[J].Ground Water,2003,41(4):493-503.
  • 4USEPA.Long term performance of permeable reactive barriers using zero-valent iron:an evaluation at two sites[R].EPA/600/S-02/001,2002.
  • 5David W. B,Carol J. P,Shawn G. B,et al.Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2000,45:123-137.
  • 6Andrea K P D, Lai C K, Kjeldsen P, et al. Effect of groundwater inorganics on the reduetive dechlorination of TCE by zero-valent iron[J].Water Air Soil Pollut.,2005,162:401-420.
  • 7Konmitsas K, Bartzas G, Paspaliaris I, et al. Inorganic contaminant fate assessment in zero- valent iron treatment walls[J]. Environmental Forensics,2006,7:207-217.
  • 8Kamolpornwijit W, Liang L, West O R, ct al. Preferential flow path development and its influence on long-term PRB performance: column study[J].J. Contam.Hydrol.,2003,66:161 - 178.
  • 9Benner S G, Gould W D, Blowes D W. Microbial populations associated with the generation and treatment of acid mine drainage [J].Chem. Geol.,2000,169:435-448.
  • 10柯水洲,欧阳衡.城市垃圾填埋场渗滤液处理工艺及其研究进展[J].给水排水,2004,30(11):26-33. 被引量:30

二级参考文献146

共引文献463

同被引文献16

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部