摘要
在学院科学中,规范性不是问题,因为这套制度本身就是为经典的知识观念及其信念量身定做的。然而,20世纪的科学涌现出诸如"大科学"和"产业科学"的研究形式,突破了既有的制度框架,同时又呈现出一种新的活力,因此称之为"后学院科学"是恰当的,成问题的是它们如何处置自己的规范性。本文认为,规范的重塑实际上是一个实现科学共同体与政府、产业界、社会公众互动的过程,确切说,是一个"治理"的过程。
During the time of academic science, normativity has never mattered, as the systems themselves are customized for classical concepts of knowledge and their beliefs. In the 20 th century, however, such new forms of research as 'big science' and 'industrial science' have sprung up, which not only break through the existing institutional frameworks, but also take on new vitality. Therefore, it is appropriate to call them 'post-academic sciences'. What's problematic is how they deal with their own normativity. This paper argues that the remodeling of norms is in fact a process of achieving the interactions between scientifi c communities, the government, industry, and the public. To be more precise, it is a process of 'governance'.
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第4期1-6,125,共6页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"科学精神
科学道德
科研伦理和学术规范的重塑和构建研究"(编号12JZD045)
关键词
后学院科学
规范性
强自治与弱自治
社会治理
Post-academic science
Normativity
Strong autonomy and week autonomy
Social governance
