摘要
正当化事由是维护体育竞技活动公正的天平,刑法介入体育竞技活动的危险状况或危害结果时应坚持谦抑性精神。立足于现有的犯罪构成理论体系,体育竞技伤害行为的正当化根据为被害人承诺理论,在立法尚未明确规定的情况下,应从承诺主题、承诺时间、承诺主体、承诺真实性、承诺表示和认识等方面加以严格认定。在被害人承诺的刑事诉讼证明上,根据新刑事诉讼法的规定,控方始终承担证明有罪的责任,且证明标准应为定罪标准,而辩方为盖然性标准。
Cause of justification is a balance used to maintain the fairness of sports competition activities; the spiritof modesty should be adhered to when criminal law involves in a dangerous situation or harmful consequence producedby a sports competition activity. Based on the existing crime constitution theory system, according to the victim’scommitment theory, the justification of a sports competition injury behavior should be strictly identified interms of commitment theme, commitment time, commitment subject, commitment authenticity, commitment expressionand acknowledge etc if it has not been clearly specified by legislation. In terms of criminal lawsuit testimonyof a victim’s commitment, according to the stipulation of the new criminal procedure law, the prosecutor undertakesthe guilty proving responsibility all the time, the standard of proof should be the standard of conviction,while the defender is the standard of probability.
出处
《体育学刊》
CAS
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期47-51,共5页
Journal of Physical Education
关键词
体育法
正当化事由
证明责任
被害人承诺
体育竞技
sports law
cause of justification
proving responsibility
victim’s commitment
competitive sports
