期刊文献+

家庭关怀度对酒依赖患者生活质量和应对方式的影响 被引量:13

The Degree of Family APGAR for Alcohol Dependence Patients and Its' Effect on Their Life Quality and Coping Styles
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨酒依赖患者家庭关怀度情况及其对生活质量和应对方式的影响。方法对入组80例患者采用家庭关怀度指数问卷(APGAR)、生活质量综合评定问卷-74(GQOLI-74)和特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)进行评定,并以家庭关怀度的高与低将患者分为两组,比较两组的生活质量和应对方式情况。结果 162%的酒依赖患者家庭关怀度较低;高家庭关怀度组GQOLI-74因子评分均高于低家庭关怀度组,其中以躯体功能和物质生活状态差异显著(t=2.57,2.39;P<0.05),心理和社会功能差异非常显著(t=3.02,2.89;P<0.01),具有统计学意义;2高家庭关怀度组TCSQ的积极应对评分高于低家庭关怀度组(t=2.71,P<0.01),消极应对评分高于家庭关怀度高组(t=-2.99,P<0.01),消极应对表现突出,差异均具有统计学意义。结论酒依赖患者存在较低的家庭关怀度;低家庭关怀度者生活质量也较低,且面对应激时倾向于消极应对。 Objective To investigate the degree of family APGAR for alcohol dependence patients and its &#39;effect on their life quality and coping styles .Methods 80 patients were divided into two groups according to APGAR scores .They were assessed with Family APGAR Index Questionnaire(APGAR),the Comprehensive Evaluation Questionnaire -74 of Life Quality(GQOLI-74) and Trait Coping Style Questionnaire(TCSQ),and compared with life quality and coping situations .Results ①62%of alcohol dependence patients had lower degree of family care;The high degree family care group&#39;s GQOLI-74 dimension scores were higher than that of the low degree group.Among them,the scores of physical(t =2.57,2.39;P〈0.05) had significant differences,and the mental function and social function score was particularly significant (t=3.02,2.89;P〈0.01).②The high degree groups&#39;TCSQ positive response scores were lower than the low group degree group (t=2.71,P〈0.01),and the negative coping scores were higher than the low group degree group (t=-2.99,P〈0.01).The negative coping was outstanding .The differences were statistically significant .Conclusion Alcohol dependence patients have lower degree of family care;The patients with low APGAR have lower quality of life ,tend to negative response facing with stress.
作者 辛奎波
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2014年第9期1291-1293,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 酒依赖 家庭关怀度 生活质量 应对方式 Alcohol dependence Family APGAR The quality of life Coping style
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献35

  • 1张秀丽,王新友,吕红霞.心理治疗与家庭干预对戒毒患者康复的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2005,13(2):114-114. 被引量:6
  • 2汪向东 王希林 马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12:217-217.
  • 3Ray C , Lindopt J , Gibson S. The concept of coping. Psyehol Med,1982,12:385-395.
  • 4Luo Y , Wang H. Correlation research on psychological health impacton nursing students against stress, coping way and social support.Nurse Educ Today ,2009 ,29 :5-8.
  • 5Sarason BR, Pierce GK, Shearin EN. Perceived social support andworking models of self and actual others. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1991,60:273-287.
  • 6Eisenberger NI,Taylor SE,Gable SL,et al. Neural pathways link so-cial support to attenuated neuroendocrine stress responses. Neuroim-age,2007 ,35 : 1601-1612.
  • 7Field T,Diego M,Hemandez-Reif M. Tai Chi/ Yoga effects on anxie-ty, heartrate, EEG and math computations. Complement Ther ClinPract,2010,16 :235-238.
  • 8Haseqawa-Ohira M,Toda M,Den R,et al. Effects of Tai Chi exerciseon physical and mental health. Nihon Eiseiqku Zasshi. 2010,65 :500-505.
  • 9Elliott D,Polman R,Mcgregor R. Relaxing music for anxiety control.J Music Ther,2011 ,48:264-288.
  • 10Jang KL,Thordarson DS,Stein MB,et al. Coping styles and personali-ty: a biometric analysis. Anxiety Stress Coping,2007 ,20 : 17-24.

共引文献628

同被引文献106

引证文献13

二级引证文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部