期刊文献+

牙科氧化锆瓷摩擦磨损性能的研究 被引量:7

Friction and wear behaviors of dental zirconia ceramics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究牙科氧化锆瓷的摩擦磨损性能以及与天然牙釉质摩擦磨损性能匹配情况。方法微摩擦磨损试验机上,以滑石瓷为对磨物,人工唾液润滑下对Upcera ST和Zenostar Zr Translucent氧化锆瓷、牙釉质和饰面瓷进行摩擦磨损实验。实验前,用激光共聚焦显微镜测试件表面粗糙度Ra;实验结束后,光学显微镜下观察滑石瓷磨斑形貌、测量滑石瓷磨斑面积;激光共聚焦显微镜测量试件磨斑宽度;扫描电镜下观察试件磨斑的微观形貌。采用单因素方差分析进行统计学分析。结果饰面瓷的磨斑宽度大于其它3种材料(P<0.01),饰面瓷对磨物滑石瓷磨斑面积大于氧化锆瓷和牙釉质(P<0.05)。结论与饰面瓷对比,氧化锆瓷具有更佳耐磨性及较低对磨物磨损,并且与天然牙釉质的磨擦学性能相似。 Objective To evaluate the zirconia ceramics'friction and wear behaviors to compare with natural enamel. Methods In a micro friction and wear testing apparatus, the friction and wear tests on Upcera ST,Zenostar Zr Translucent,teeth enamel and veneering ceramic were carried out under artificial saliva lubrication condition and steatite served as antagonist. Before wear test, surface roughness (Ra) was determined by laser scanning confocal microscope. After test, the wear morphology of steatite was observed under light microscope and the wear area measured. The width of the wear area was measured by laser scanning confocal microscope and the scanning electron microscopy was used to observe the wear surface micro-morphology of the ceramics and enamel. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results The width of the wear area on the veneering ceramic was greater than other three materials (P 〈 0. 01 ). Veneering ceramic caused significantly higher antagonist wear than zirconia and teeth enamel ( P〈 0. 05 ) . Conclusion Zirconia ceramics yielded superior wear resistance and lower antagonistic wear compared to veneering porcelains and achieved wear properties similar to natual enamel.
出处 《北京口腔医学》 CAS 2014年第3期137-140,共4页 Beijing Journal of Stomatology
基金 北京市自然科学基金(7112060) 北京市卫生系统高层次技术人才培养项目(2011-3-075)
关键词 牙科氧化锆瓷 牙釉质 摩擦磨损试验 磨斑微观形貌 Dental zirconia ceramic Teeth enamel Friction and wear tests Wear surface micro-morphology
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia-and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont,2010, 23(6) :493-502.
  • 2Wang L, Liu YH, Si WJ, et al. Friction and wear behaviors of dental ceramics against natural tooth enamel. J Eur Ceram Soc, 2012, 32 ( 11 ) :2599-2606.
  • 3Dowson D. History of Tribology. 2nd. London: Professional Engineering, 1998. 577.
  • 4皮昕.口腔解剖生理学.第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:15.
  • 5Elmaria A, Goldstein G, Vijayaraghavan T, et al. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold. J Prosthet Dent, 2006,96 (5) : 345 -353.
  • 6Preis V, Behr M, Handel G, et al. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater,2012,10 : 13-22.
  • 7Wassell RW, McCabe J, Walls AWG. Wear rates of regular and tempered composites. J Dent, 1997,25 ( 1 ) :49-52.
  • 8刘晶莹,郭长军,孟令强,李旭华.四种陶瓷材料与牙釉质磨耗性能的研究[J].武警医学院学报,2009,18(7):591-593. 被引量:6
  • 9Aibashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent ,2010, 104(2) :105-113.
  • 10Jung YS, Lee JW, Choi YJ, et al. A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing ziroonia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont, 2010,2 ( 3 ) : 111-115.

二级参考文献6

共引文献8

同被引文献52

  • 1吕文芳,康宏,吕晋军,高飞,包广洁,席戈.牙用亚微米氧化锆增韧氧化铝陶瓷的摩擦磨损性能研究[J].摩擦学学报,2006,26(3):264-269. 被引量:7
  • 2温诗铸,黄平.摩擦学原理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2012.
  • 3Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112(5): 1141-1150. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.006.
  • 4Heintze SD, Zellweger G, Zappini G. The relationship between physical parameters and wear of dental composites[J]. Wear, 2007, 263: 1138-1146.
  • 5Chong B J, Thangavel AK, Rohon SB, et al. Clinical and laboratory surface finishing procedures for zirconia on opposing human enamel wear: Behav Biomed Mater, 2015, jmbbm.2015.06.007. a laboratory study[J]. J Mech 50: 93-103. DO[: 10.1016/j.
  • 6Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, et al. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013, 109(1): 22-29. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60005-0.
  • 7Park JH, Park S, Lee K, et al. Antagonist wear of three CAD/ CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 111(1): 20-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.002.
  • 8Theocharopoulos A, Chen X, Hill R, et al. Reduced wear of enamel with novel fine and nano-scale leueite glass-ceramics [J]. J Dent, 2013, 41(6): 561-568. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent. 2013.02.006.
  • 9Kontos L, Schille C, Schweizer E, et al. Influence of surface treatment on the wear of solid zirconia[J]. Acta Odontol Stand, 2013, 71(3/4): 482-487. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2012. 696690.
  • 10Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, et al. Wear of ceramic and antagonist: a systematic evaluation ofinfluencing factors in vitro[J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(4): 433-449. DOI: 10.1016/j. dental.2007.06.016.

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部