期刊文献+

玻璃体腔注射Ranibizumab联合激光治疗BRVO继发黄斑水肿的观察 被引量:15

Intravitreal injection with Ranibizumab combined with laser therapy for macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价玻璃体腔注射ranibizumab(雷珠单抗)联合激光治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞(branch retinal vein occlusion,BRVO)继发黄斑水肿(macular edema)的临床疗效。方法:经眼底荧光血管造影(fundus fluorescence angiography,FFA)及光学相干断层扫描(optical coherence tomography,OCT)检查确诊为BRVO合并黄斑水肿的患者78例78眼,随机选取A组26例26眼,行黄斑部格栅光凝(grid laser photocoagulation,GLP);B组26例26眼,先行黄斑部格栅光凝,1wk后再行玻璃体腔注射ranibizumab治疗;C组26例26眼,先行玻璃体腔注射ranibizumab治疗,1wk后再行黄斑部格栅光凝,三组黄斑水肿无显著性差异。对比分析三组治疗前,治疗后1wk,1及6mo患者最佳矫正视力(best corrected visual acuity,BCVA)、黄斑中心厚度(central macular thickness,CMT)的变化。结果:治疗后1wk与治疗前相比:A组BCVA平均值、CMT平均值变化差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);B、C组BCVA平均值提高,CMT平均值降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);组间比较BCVA变化、CMT变化差异具有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗后1,6mo与治疗前相比,三组BCVA平均值提高,CMT平均值降低,差异均具有显著统计学意义(P<0.01);组间比较BCVA变化、CMT变化差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后6mo与治疗后1mo相比,A、B组BCVA平均值、CMT平均值变化差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);C组BCVA平均值提高,CMT平均值降低,差异具有显著统计学意义(P<0.01);组间比较BCVA变化、CMT变化差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:玻璃体腔注射Ranibizumab联合激光治疗可有效的减轻BRVO所致黄斑水肿,提升视力;其作用较单纯GLP治疗起效更迅速、能更好的减轻黄斑水肿;于黄斑格栅光凝治疗前先行玻璃体腔注射ranibizumab治疗效果更为确切、稳定性更强。 AIM: To investigate the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab combined with laser therapy in the treatment of macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion(BRVO).METHODS:There were 78 patients(78 eyes) who were diagnosed with macular edema caused by BRVO using fundus fluorescence angiography( FFA) and optical coherence tomography( OCT). Group A: randomly selected 26 cases( 26 eyes) were given grid laser photocoagulation(GLP). Group B: randomly selected 26 cases(26 eyes) were given GLP first,and then received intravitreal ranibizumab 1wk later. Group C: randomly selected 26 cases( 26 eyes) undergone intravitreal ranibizumab first,and then given GLP 1wk later. There was no significant difference in macular edema. We analyzed the changes in the best corrected visual activity(BCVA),central macular thickness(CMT) before and 1 wk,1,6mo after treatment.RESULTS: Compared with before treatment,1wk after treatment: mean value changes of BCVA and CMT were no significant difference in group A( P〈0. 05); mean value changes of BCVA was improved and mean value of CMT was decreased in groups B and C,the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 05); BCVA and CMT changes between groups had statistical significance( P〈0. 01); After treatment 1,6mo: compared with before treatment,mean BCVA was improved in three groups,mean CMT was lower,the differences were statisticallysignificant( P〈0. 01); BCVA and CMT changes between groups were statistically significant(P〈0. 05); compared with 1mo after treatment,mean BCVA and CMT were no significant difference(P〈0. 05) between groups A and B after 6mo treatment; mean BCVA improved and CMT average value was decreased in group C,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0. 01); BCVA and CMT changes between groups were statistically significant(P〈0.01). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection ranibizumab combined laser therapy can effectively reduce BRVO induced macular edema,enhance vision acuity. Compared with GLP,combination therapy has more rapid onset of treatment,and reduce macular edema better; Intravitreal ranibizumab should be given in front of the GLP,and the treatment effect is more precise,more stability.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2014年第8期1399-1402,共4页 International Eye Science
关键词 雷珠单抗 视网膜分支静脉阻塞 黄斑水肿 ranibizumab branch retinal vein occlusion macular edema
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Rajendram R,Fraser-Bell S,Kaines A,et al.A 2-year prospective randomized controlled trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy( BOLT)in the management of diabetic macular edema:24-month data:report 3.Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130(8):972-979.
  • 2Kwan AS.Laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular oedema in the era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy:is there a role? Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012;40(6):535-536.
  • 3The Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group.Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion.Am J Ophthalmol 1984;98(3):271-282.
  • 4Toropygin SG.Modern aspects of surgical treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion.Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk 2009;8:29-32.
  • 5Mitchell P,Smith W,Chang A.Prevalence and associations of retinal vein occlusion in Australia:The Blue Mountains Eye Study.Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114(10):1243-1247.
  • 6Klein R,Klein BE,Moss SE,et al.The epidenmiology of retinal vein occlusion:the Beaver Dam Eye Study.Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2000;98:133-141.
  • 7The Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group.Argon laser scatter hotocoagulation for prevention of neovascularization and vitreous hem orrhage in branch vein occlusion.Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104(1):34-41.
  • 8李慧俐,李娜,徐蕾.曲安奈德与激光治疗静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿[J].中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2011,33(8):622-623. 被引量:3
  • 9Scholl S,Augustin A,Loewenstein A,et al.General pathophysiology of macular edema.Eur J Ophthalmol 2011;21(S6):10-19.
  • 10Salam A,DaCosta J,Sivaprasad S.Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for diabetic maculopathy.Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94(7):821-826.

二级参考文献4

共引文献6

同被引文献117

引证文献15

二级引证文献183

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部