期刊文献+

不对称情绪分享过程中情绪反应自我指向增强效应的初探 被引量:3

The Enhancement of Self-orientation on Counterempathy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 主客体之间产生不一致的情绪反应称之为不对称共情(Counterempathy)。在Decety提出的情绪分享过程两阶段及Goubert提出的"指向自己"和"指向他人"两种情绪反应指向的研究基础上,构建不对称情绪分享过程的两阶段模型,通过创建竞争环境,检验在不对称情绪分享过程中是否存在情绪反应自我指向增强效应的这一假设。被试根据竞争对手的情绪表情(皱眉和笑脸)来完成情绪反应自我指向(判断被试者自己的输赢)和情绪反应他人指向(判断竞争对手的输赢)的实验任务。结果表明:在不对称情绪分享过程中,存在情绪反应自我指向的增强效应。被试不仅在自我指向任务中产生了不对称共情,而且在他人指向任务中也产生了不对称共情,这说明在有意识的不对称情绪分享过程中,个体会分化出比他人指向更强烈的自我指向的情绪反应。并且,相较他人指向任务,个体在自我指向任务中产生了更强烈的不对称共情。尤其当竞争对手获利时,个体会产生更强烈的指向自我的负性情绪。 The biological predisposition to resonate emotionally with another person is regarded as a critical aspect of social interaction. However, the emotional responses to others are often discordant with the object's (target's) emotional experience. The discrepant emotional responses are called "counterempathy". Based on the research of the two-stage process of emotion sharing proposed by Decety, and "self-oriented" and "other- orientated" emotional responses proposed by Goubet, we built the counterempathic emotion sharing process model under a competitive environment. Here we propose that in the counterempathic emotional sharing process, the individuals tend to generate stronger "self- oriented" emotional response compared to the "other-oriented" emotional response. The experiment was designed to test the enhancement effect of self- orientation on counterempathy by manipulating the orientation (self vs. other-orientation) and competitor's facial expressions (frown vs. smile). Participants (10 men; 19 women) were convinced that they were playing a card game with another player seated in the adjoining room. They were requested to make judgment of the participants' own win/lose and generate "self- oriented" emotional response through the competitor's facial expressions (smile/frown) presented on the computer screen, similarly, to make judgment of the competitor's win/lose and generate "other-oriented" emotional response. Reaction time, accuracy were collected during the tasks. To assess the manipulating effect of orientation, participants were required to complete emotional self-assessment scale at the end of each manipulating phase; and we analyzed the results using repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with Orientation (self vs. other- orientation) and Facial Expressions (frown vs. smile) as within-subjects variables. We observed a clear enhancement effect of self-orientation on counterempathy. Participants responded with an asymmetric emotion towards the competitor automatically both in the "self-oriented" and "other-oriented" condition. Participants had a higher accuracy and showed stronger asymmetric valence ratings to the competitor in the "self-oriented" condition compared to "other-oriented" condition; besides, they responded slower and showed more negative valence ratings to the competitor's winning in the "self-oriented" condition. The results of the study support the enhancement effect of self-orientation on counterempathy. The results indicate that individuals could respond with asymmetric emotion towards their competitors automatically not only in the "self-oriented" condition, but also in the "other- oriented" condition, suggesting that the individuals tend to generate stronger "self- oriented" emotional response, while Decety only mentioned the "other-oriented "emotional response which induces empathic concern in the conscious emotional sharing process Moreover, "self-oriented" condition strengthens individuals' asymmetric emotional response compare to "other-oriented" condition, especially for the competitor's winning.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期1103-1111,共9页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31371057) 华南师范大学广东省心理健康与认知科学重点实验室 国家基础科学人才培养基金(J1210024 J1310031) 幸福广州心理服务与辅导基地资助
关键词 竞争情境 指向自我 共情关注 不对称共情情绪分享过程 competitive situation self-orientation empathic concern counterempathic emotion sharing process
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献62

  • 1Moriguchi Y, Decety J, Ohnishi T, Maeda M, Mori T, Nemoto, K, Matsuda H, Komaki G. Empathy and judging other's pain: An fMRI study of alexithymia[J]. Cerebral Cortex, 2007, 17: 2223-2234.
  • 2Wentzel K R, Filisetti L, Looney L. Adolescent prosocial behavior: The role of self processes and contextual eues[J]. Child Development, 2007, 78: 895-910.
  • 3Hoffman M L. Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 1130-1352.
  • 4Johnson J A. Empathy is a personality disposition[G]//In R. MacKay, J. Hughes, & J. Carver (Eds.), Empathy in the helping relationship. NY: Springer, 1990: 49-64.
  • 5Hoffman M L. Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy [G]//In Izard C, Kagan J, Zajonc R B(gds. ), Emotions, cognition, and behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, 103-131.
  • 6Lawrence E J, Shaw P, Baker D, Baron-Cohen S, David A S. Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient[J]. Psychological Medicine, 2004, 34: 911-919.
  • 7GazzolaV, Aziz-Zadeh L, Keysers C. Empathy and the somatotopie auditory mirror system in humans[J]. Current Biology, 2006, 16:1 -6.
  • 8Davis M H. The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach[J]. Journal of Personality, 1983, 51: 167-184.
  • 9Decety J. Human empathy[J]. Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology, 2006, 22 : 11-33.
  • 10de Waal F. Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy[J]. The Annual Review of Psychology, 2008, 59: 1-22.

共引文献72

同被引文献38

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部