摘要
目的:研究DHS和解剖型锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法:选取2012年4月-2013年4月本院收治的20例股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床资料,按随机数字表法将患者分为DHS组与解剖型锁定钢板组,每组各10例。比较两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、引流量与治疗效果。结果:两组的治疗效果比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。解剖型锁定钢板组的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、引流量均低于DHS组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:解剖型锁定钢板与DHS均能够取得良好的疗效,不过使用解剖型锁定钢板治疗,可减少患者出血量,缩短手术治疗时间,同时还可控制引流量,值得临床推广应用。
Objective：To study the clinical efficacy of DHS and anatomic locking plate in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.Method：The clinical data of 20 patients with intertrochanteric fracture in our hospital from April 2012 to April 2013 were selected,they were randomly divided into the DHS group and the anatomy locking plate group,each group had 10 cases,respectively. The surgery time,hospitalization time,blood loss,drainage and treatment effect of the two groups were compared.Result：There were no statistically significant in the treatment effect of the two groups（P〉0.05）. The operative time,hospital stay,blood loss,drainage of the anatomic locking plate group were lower than the DHS group,the differences were statistical significance（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：Anatomic locking plate and DHS are able to achieve good results,but the use of anatomic locking plate treatment,can reduce the amount of bleeding in patients,shorter surgery time,while also controlling drainage,worthy of clinical application.
出处
《中国医学创新》
CAS
2014年第24期44-45,共2页
Medical Innovation of China
