期刊文献+

PFNA与PCCP内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的体外生物力学分析 被引量:7

Biomechanical analysis of PFNA and PCCP for fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture in femur specimens from fresh cadavers
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过对尸体标本的力学研究比较股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)和经皮加压钢板(PCCP)固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的生物力学性能。方法 8具新鲜尸体的双股骨上段标本共16侧,建立A1.1型(AO分型)股骨粗隆间骨折模型。随机分为PFNA组和PCCP组,各8侧,先行扭转强度试验,再行压缩强度试验,最后进行破坏试验。结果标本扭转强度测试表明扭转1.5°时2组扭矩及扭转刚度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),表明2种内固定抗旋转性能相近。标本压缩强度测试表明800 N载荷下2组的压缩位移及刚度比较差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.05),PFNA组明显高于PCCP组。破坏试验中2组的极限载荷比较差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.05),PFNA组明显大于PCCP组。结论 PFNA具有良好的抗旋转能力,其抗压缩能力强于PCCP,在内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折时较PCCP更具生物力学优势。 Objective To compare the biomechanical characteristics of PFNA and PCCP in the fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture through the biomechanical test of femur specimens from fresh cadavers. Methods Sixteen specimens of bilateral femurs from 8 fresh cadavers were prepared, and the femoral intertrochanteric fracture model of A1.1 (AO classification) was established. The specimens were randomly divided into PFNA group and PCCP group. The torsional strength test was performed first, then compression strength test, and finally destructive testing. Results The torsional strength tests of specimens showed that: both torque and torsional stiffness of two groups in turn 1.5~, had no statistical significance(P 〉 0.05), the anti-retational features of the 2 internal fixation was similar. The compressive strength test of specimens showed that: both displacement and compression stiffness of two groups under 800 N load had significant statistical significance (P 〈 0.05), PFNA group was significantly higher than that of PCCP. The destructive testing showed: the maximum load of two groups had significant statistical significance (P 〈0.05), PFNA group was larger than the PCCP group. Conclusion PFNA is designed scientifically with good anti-rotation property. It is better than PCCP in anti-compression property,offers distinct biomechanical advantage over PCCP in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2014年第8期756-758,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
基金 深圳市龙岗区科技发展基金(ys2012189)
关键词 股骨粗隆间骨折 股骨近端防旋髓内钉 经皮加压钢板 生物力学 Femoral intertrochanteric fracture Proximal femur nail antirotation Percutaneous compression platin Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1贺良,王满宜.安全治疗高龄骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(9):992-994. 被引量:19
  • 2闫丽娅,周波,侯菊倩,王晓红,韩延柏.中国沈阳髋部骨折的流行病学研究[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,1996,2(2):69-71. 被引量:15
  • 3王佩芳,王培嘉,唐燕红,蔡定芳.骨质疏松性骨折的治疗费用2000—2004年统计[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2006,12(3):274-277. 被引量:19
  • 4Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int, 1997, 7:407~413.
  • 5Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, et al. Randomized comparison of re- duction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthro- plasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 2006, 88:279-286.
  • 6Riggs BL, Melton LJ. The worldwide problem osteoporosis : insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone, 1995,17 Suppl: 505.
  • 7PhilipD.张江林译.Osteoporosis frequency, corsequences, andriskfactor.美国医学杂志中文版,1997,4:16.
  • 8Mak JC, Cameron ID, March LM, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of hip fractures in older persons : an update. Med J Aust02010,192:37-41.
  • 9Zabari A, Lubart E, Ganz FD, et al. The effect of a pain management program on the rehabilitation of elderly patients following hip fracture surgery. Isr Med Assoc J, 2012, 14 : 104- 106.
  • 10Lane JM, Riley EH, Wirganowicz PZ. Osteoporosis : diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1996,78:618-632.

共引文献82

同被引文献52

引证文献7

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部