期刊文献+

支持教育对乳腺癌患者化疗期间焦虑、抑郁和自我效能感的影响 被引量:13

Effect of support-education on the anxiety, depression and self-efficacy in breast cancer patients during chemotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨支持教育对乳腺癌患者化疗期间焦虑、抑郁和自我效能感的影响。方法选取80例2013年1-10月完成术后第1化疗疗程,焦虑自评量表( SAS)和抑郁自评量表( SAS)标准分50~59分的乳腺癌患者,按入选顺序随机分为研究组和对照组各40例,再进行一般自我效能感量表(GSES)测评,对照组患者给予肿瘤化疗常规护理和心理护理,研究组患者在对照组的基础上给予Orem自理模式支持教育系统干预,所有病例于第2和第3疗程结束的次日再次进行SDS、SAS、GSES测评,将所得数据进行统计学分析。结果干预后,第2疗程对照组与研究组SDS评分分别为(50.20±2.26),(47.70±3.96)分;SAS评分分别为(51.55±2.81),(48.60±4.56)分;GSES评分分别为(1.76±0.31),(2.06±0.41)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t值分别为8.797,10.223,14.585;P<0.01):第3疗程对照组和研究组SDS评分分别为(47.50±2.32),(43.65±4.44)分;SAS 评分分别为(47.55±3.39),(43.05±5.62):GSES评分分别为(1.85±0.34),(2.27±0.41),两组比较差异有统计学意义(t值分别为10.466,11.473,28.283;P<0.01)。结论支持教育护理模式提高患者的一般自我效能感,明显改善患者焦虑、抑郁状态,值得在临床护理推广。 Objective To explore the effect of support-education on the anxiety , depression and self-efficacy in breast cancer patients during chemotherapy .Methods Eighty breast cancer patients with chemotherapy from January 2013 to October 2013, whose standard scores of self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and the self-rating depression scale ( SDS) were 50-59 points after the first course of chemotherapy , were chosen and randomly divided into the control group and the research group , each with 40 cases.The control group received the routine chemotherapy nursing and psychological care , and the research group received the system intervention of Orem mode of support-education on the basis of the control group .All patients were surveyed by SDS, SAS and general self-efficacy scale ( GSES) next day after the second and third course of chemotherapy , and the data were analyzed .Results After the second course of chemotherapy , the scores of SDS in the control group and the research group were respectively (50.20 ±2.26) and (47.70 ±3.96), and the scores of SAS were respectively (51.55 ±2.81) and (48.60 ±4.56), and the scores of GSES were respectively (1.76 ± 0.31) and (2.06 ±0.41), and the differences were statistically significant (t=8.797, 10.223, 14.585, respectively;P〈0.01).After the third course of chemotherapy , the scores of SDS in the control group and the research group were respectively (47.50 ±2.32) and (43.65 ±4.44), and the scores of SAS were respectively (47.55 ±3.39) and (43.05 ±5.62), and the scores of GSES were respectively (1.85 ±0.34) and (2.27 ± 0.41), and the differences were statistically significant ( t =10.466, 11.473, 28.283, respectively; P 〈0.01).Conclusions The nursing model of support-education can increase the patients ’ general self-efficacy, and significantly improve the anxiety and depression in patients , and is worthy of clinical promotion .
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2014年第22期2778-2781,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 广东省汕头市科技计划项目(20138827)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 焦虑 抑郁 自我效能感 支持 教育 Breast cancer Anxiety Depression Self-efficacy Support-education
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献39

共引文献257

同被引文献125

  • 1张瑞丽.乳腺癌保乳根治手术术中护理方法初探[J].中华现代护理杂志,2007,13(35):3482-3483. 被引量:1
  • 2汪博,刘琳,赵晓慧.人性化护理方法在乳腺癌患者临床护理中的应用价值[J].现代养生,2014,0(18):163-163. 被引量:6
  • 3章永.个体行为的评量依据与评量技术[J].乐山师范学院学报,2004,19(10):30-32. 被引量:1
  • 4Bergsma LJ, Mary EC. Effectiveness of health-promoting media literacy education: a systematic review [ J ]. Health Educ Res, 2008,23 (3) :522-542.
  • 5Mers WA, Ballmer U. Demographic factors influencing psychiatric rating scales (Zung SDS and SAS ) [ J ]. Pharmacopsychiatry, 1984,17 (2) :50-56.
  • 6Tanaka H, Tsukuma H, Masaoka T, et al. Suicide risk among cancer patients: experience at one medical center in Japan 1978- 1994[J]. Jpn J Cancer Res,1999,90(8) :812-817.
  • 7Hcidarzadeh M, Atashpeikar S, Jalilazar T. Relationship between quality of life and self care ability in patients receiving hemodialysis [ J ]. Iran J Nur Midwifery Res ,2010 ,15 ( 2 ) :71-76.
  • 8Seto E, Leonard K J, Cafazzo JA, et al. Self-care and quality of life of heart failure patients at a multidisciplinary heart function clinic[J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs,2011,26(5) :377-385.
  • 9何晨平,凡哲梅,聂淑芬,等.乳腺癌患者术后化疗后呼吸道感染的相关因素分析及护理对策[J].中国中医药科技,2014,18(21),239.
  • 10陈小红,刘爱琴,吴美华.影响肺癌住院患者心理状况的多因素分析[J].国际护理学杂志,2008,27(11):1206-1207. 被引量:7

引证文献13

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部