非物质文化遗产旅游开发风险评价——以天津市为例被引量：26

Evaluation on the Risk of Tourism Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage:A Case Study of Tianjin City

下载PDF

导出

摘要在对非物质文化遗产旅游开发风险识别的基础上,通过模糊评价法建立多级模糊综合评价模型,对天津传统表演艺术、工艺美术和民俗三类主要的非物质文化遗产旅游开发风险进行评价。天津非物质文化遗产旅游开发风险整体处于较低水平,适宜旅游开发;不同类型的非物质文化遗产旅游开发风险不同,民俗类旅游开发风险最高,工艺美术类次之,传统表演艺术类最低;三类非物质文化遗产旅游开发的客体风险都很高,环境风险相对较低,主体风险最低。在开发过程中应对不同类型的非物质文化遗产的各类风险予以不同程度的关注。 Protecting and inheriting the intangible cultural heritage by means of tourism development has been generally recognized and practiced, while the risks were seldom realized. Based on the risk identification of tourism development of intangible cultural heritage, the article built a risk evaluation model for tourism development of in- tangible cultural heritage employing fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and evaluated the risks of tourism de- velopment of three types of intangible cultural heritage, namely traditional performance, art and craft, and folk cus- tom in Tianjin. The result reveals that intangible cultural heritage in Tianjin undertakes a lower level of risk in tourism development; risks of tourism development of different types of intangible cultural heritage are different, that of the folk custom is the highest, that of art and craft is lower, and that of traditional perform is lowest ; the ob- ject risk of the three types are all very high, the environment risk is relatively lower, and the subject risk is lowest. Different level of concern should be concentrated on in the process of tourism development of different types of in- tangible cultural heritage.

作者李烨王庆生李志刚

机构地区天津商业大学商学院天津商业大学管理创新与评价研究中心

出处《地域研究与开发》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期88-93,共6页 Areal Research and Development

基金天津市艺术科学研究规划项目(E12064) 国家自然科学基金项目(71373174)

关键词非物质文化遗产旅游开发风险天津市 intangible cultural heritage tourism development risk Tianjin City

分类号 F590 [经济管理—旅游管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Arizpe L. Intangible Cultural Heritage, Diversity and Co- herence [ J ]. Museum International, 2004,56 ( 1/2 ) : 130 - 136.
2Bedjaoui M. The Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cuhural Heritage:The Legal Framework and U- niversally Recognized Principles [ J ]. Museum Internation- al,2004,56(1/2) :150 - 155.
3Barrio M J, Devesa M, Herrero L C. Evaluating Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Case of Cultural Festivals [ J ]. Cit- y, Culture and Society,2012,3 (4) :235 - 244.
4Deacon H. Intangible Heritage in Conservation Management Planning: The Case of Robben Island [ J ]. International Journal of Heritage Studies,2004,10(3) :309 - 319.
5Nettleford R. Migration, Transmission and Maintenance of the Intangible Heritage [ J ]. Museum International, 2004, 56(1/2) :78 -83.
6Yoshida K. The Museum and the Intangible Cultural Her- itage[ J ]. Museum International, 2004,56 ( 1/2 ) : 108 - 112.
7Carrozzino M, Scucces A, Leonardi R, et al. Virtually Pre- serving the Intangible Heritage of Artistic Handicraft[ J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage,2011,12 ( 1 ) : 82 - 87.
8Vandivera P B. Craft Knowledge as An Intangible Cultural Property: A Case Study of Samarkand Tiles and Traditional Potters in Uzbekistan[C]//Mass J, Merkel J,Murray A, et al. 2004 MRS Fall Meeting. England : Cambridge Uni- versity Press ,2004.
9Demotte R. National Policies Concerning Intangible Cul- tural Heritage:The Example of Belgium' s French Com- munity [ J ]. Museum International, 2004,56 ( 1/2 ) : 174 - 179.
10Cominelli F, Greffe X. Intangible Cultural Heritage:Safe- guarding for Creativity [ J ]. City, Culture and Society, 2012,3(4) :245 -250.