期刊文献+

Comments on the Chinese Law of Conflict of Laws Applicable to Trusts: In Comparison with the U.S. Law and the Hague Convention 被引量:1

Comments on the Chinese Law of Conflict of Laws Applicable to Trusts: In Comparison with the U.S. Law and the Hague Convention
原文传递
导出
摘要 China has entered a new era represented by the newly established China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone, in which further reform and development of its financial system and capital market are highly prioritized. The trust as an important vehicle in development of the financial market in China as well as in the world will play an important role, and there will be more foreign elements involved in Chinese trusts. The Law of the People's Republic of China on Application of Laws in Civil Relations with Foreign Elements provides rules, in its article 17, on the application of laws to trusts, which symbolizes the formal creation of rules of conflict of laws in China in this area. However, it seems to cause more problems than it may resolve. For example, it may not always be possible for the parties to determine the appli- cable law through consultation and agreement, and the parties' right to choice of law should not be without limitation either. By allowing judges to choose from "the law of the situs where the trust property is situated" and "the law of the situs where the trust relationship occurred" in the absence of an effective choice of law by the parties may lead to a situation contrary to existing laws and may create uncertainty for the parties as well. This paper analyzes this article 17 by comparing it with the conflict law rules adopted in the United States and by the Hague Convention, identifies problems, and seeks to find solutions in order to promote the healthy development of the trust system in China.
作者 Lingyun Gao
机构地区 School of Law
出处 《Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences》 2014年第3期483-501,共19页 复旦人文社会科学论丛(英文版)
关键词 Trust law Conflict of trust laws Applicable rules of law to trusts Party autonomy The doctrine of most significant relationship 美国法律 中国法律 信托 公约 中华人民共和国 法律冲突 当事人 资本市场
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Bogert, George T. 1987. Trust (Sixth Ed.) I. US: West Group.
  • 2Diyi Xintuo Wang (No. I Trust Net). 2013. Kunshanchungao Zhaiquanan Zaiyin Bianlun, Sifajiguan Jiujie Yanchang Zhouqi (The case arising from Kunshanchungao's default causing more debates, judicial organ postponing the decision-making). http://www.dyxtw.comlnews/2013032711173.html (March 27, 2013).
  • 3Du, Tao. 2011. Shewai Minshiguanxi Falvshiyongfa Shiping (Comments on the law on application of law in civil relations with foreign elements). Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.
  • 4Felix, Robert L., and Ralph U. Whitten. 2011. American conflicts law, 6th ed. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
  • 5Hague Conference on Private International Law. 1984. Hague convention on the law applicable to trusts and on their recognition.
  • 6Gao, Lingyun. 2010. BeiWududeXintuo-Xintuofa Yuanlun (trust law-a misunderstood system). Shanghai: Fudan University Press.
  • 7Geng, Yong. 2000. A unified rule of conflict of laws applicable to international trusts. In 3 Henan Institute of Political Sciences and Law Management.
  • 8He, Baoyu. 2005. Xintuofa Yuanli Yanjiu (A Research on Trust Law Principles). Beijing: China University of Political Sciences and Law.
  • 9Langbein, John H. 1995. The Contractarian Basis of the Law of Trusts. In 105 Yale L.1. 625.
  • 10Sedler, Robert, & Cramton, Roger. 1977. Sum & substance of conflict of laws. Center for creative educational services.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部