摘要
分析了中西方传统艺术与园林设计的原型、方法、作品、思维方式、结果、自然观,并对西方现代构成理论和空间理论进行了系统的反思和评价。发现西方现代构成理论与西方传统艺术、园林设计理论一脉相承,依然是孤立、静止、片面、局部的二元论世界观,其本质均为忽视自然存在的图面设计方法。西方空间理论关注物理空间的研究,缺乏对人文精神的关怀,其空间观念难以达到"意境"层次。西方现代构成理论和空间理论在园林设计等空间设计和教学的应用具有一定的副作用,应该引起业界的重视。中西方园林设计方法的差异在于追求整体的"境"和追求局部的"景"。
The paper analyzed the prototypes, methods, works, thinking ways, results and natural view of Chinese and Western traditional art and garden designing, and rethought and appraised the Western modern formation theory and modern space theory systematically. It was found that the Western formation theory is coherent with the Western traditional art and garden designing theory, and it still sees things as isolated, static and one-sided, only a graphic design method that takes the nature as nothing. The Western space theory pays more attention to the physical property of space and less attention to the spiritual property of space, And its space concept could not reach the ＂jing（artistic conception）＂ level. The Western modern formation theory and space theory have side effects on the space designing and education, which should be taken seriously. The differences between Chinese and Western views of garden designing lie in a space of feelings or a picture of perspective.
出处
《中国园林》
北大核心
2014年第7期28-31,共4页
Chinese Landscape Architecture
关键词
风景园林
现代构成理论
现代空间理论
图案设计
空间设计
“景”
“境”
landscape architecture
modern formation theory
modern space theory
pattern design
space design
＂jing（scenery）＂
＂jing（artistic conception）＂
