摘要
自宋代至今,人们对"秘色瓷"的确切所指不能定论。20世纪80年代以来,伴随着法门寺秘色瓷实物的出土,学界又一次掀起了秘色瓷研究高潮,但对于"秘色"涵义、秘色瓷产地等,仍未得出最终论断。综合秘色瓷产生的历史背景、法门寺出土的《物帐碑》和相应实物、历代有关研究资料等进行分析,可以得出基本判断:一、秘色不是指颜色、秘密配方、罕见珍品等。二,秘色瓷与佛教派别秘密教(密宗)密切相关,秘代表秘密教,色代表物质,密教之色即秘密教供养的器物。三,秘色瓷器指唐代皇帝用于迎送佛骨舍利的13件法器。四,认为秘色瓷产于浙江余姚上林湖越窑的说法,并无可信依据。
From Song Dynasty till now, people haven＇t drawn a final conclusion of what MISECI refers to. Since 1980s, China set off an upsurge of MISECI study with MISECI unearthed from Famen Temple. But, there has been no convincing assertion about place of origin and meaning. Combining the historical background of MISECI, unearthed objects from Famen Temple and relevant research data of past dynasties, the author reach a judgment which covers four aspects. First of all, MISE neither refers to color, nor secret recipe. Second, MISECI is closely related with Esoteric Buddhism. Third, MISE porcelain refers to the 13 pieces of musical instruments Tang Emperor used in Buddhist masss. Fourth, statement which points out that MISECI is native to Yue Kiln in Zhejiang Yuyao Timberlake is short of credible grounds.
出处
《西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第5期167-171,共5页
Journal of Northwest University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
秘色瓷
秘色
秘密教
越窑
MISECI
MISE
Esoteric Buddhism
Yue Kiln
