期刊文献+

微型双边外固定支架结合有限内固定治疗严重中足骨折脱位 被引量:8

Severe midfoot fracture-dislocation treated with external biplanar mini-fixator and limited internal fixation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨微型双边外固定支架结合有限内固定治疗严重中足骨折脱位的临床疗效.方法 对2009年5月至2012年8月收治的8例严重中足骨折脱位患者资料进行回顾性分析,男6例,女2例;年龄28 ~57岁,平均35.4岁.开放性损伤按Gustilo分型:Ⅱ型1例,Ⅲ型7例;中足骨折合并跗横关节脱位2例,跖跗关节脱位4例,跗横关节与跖跗关节均脱位2例.对骨折与脱位进行复位后,以微型双边外固定支架进行固定,恢复并保持足的内、外侧柱长度及正常足弓形态,必要时可结合有限内固定.术后12 ~16周拆除外固定支架,采用美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)中足评分和疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估临床疗效. 结果 所有患者术后获10 ~24个月(平均13.4个月)随访.术后X线片示骨折脱位均获得良好复位,内、外固定拆除后无复位丢失.患者均能自主行走,随访期间未出现创伤性关节炎及足部畸形.术后3、6、12个月AOFAS中足评分平均分别为65.8、71.3、80.6分,术后3、6、12个月VAS评分平均分别为7.5、4.3、1.2分. 结论 对于严重中足骨折脱位,微型双边外固定支架结合有限内固定能很好地恢复内、外侧柱的长度及足弓的正常形态,维持复位稳定性,避免了足部畸形导致的功能障碍. Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of external biplanar mini-fixator and limited internal fixation in treatment of severe midfoot fracture-dislocation.Methods Eight patients with severe midfoot fracture-dislocation were admitted from May 2009 to August 2012.They were 6 men and 2 women,28 to 57 years of age (average,35.4 years).According to the Gustilo classification,there were one type Ⅱand 7 cases of type Ⅲ.Two cases of midfoot fracture were complicated with dislocation of the transverse tarsal joint,4 with dislocation of the tarsometatarsal joint,and 2 with dislocation of both the transverse tarsal joint and the tarsometatarsal joint.The external biplanar mini-fixator was applied to stabilize and maintain lengths of the medial and lateral columns and normal geometry of the foot arch after reduction of the fracture-dislocation.K-wires were used if limited internal fixation was necessary.The external fixator was removed at 12 to 16 weeks postoperatively.The clinical treatment efficacy was assessed by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scale and the visual analogue scale (VAS).Results The patients were followed up for an average of 13.4 months (from 10 to 24 months).Postoperative radiological films showed fine reduction of the fractures and dislocations.No reduction was lost after removal of external and internal fixations.They were able to walk independently and had good functional recovery of the injured feet without traumatic arthritis during the follow-up period.Their average AOFAS scores were 65.8 at 3 months after operation,71.3 at 6 months and 80.6 at 12 months; the average VAS scores were 7.5 at 3 months,4.3 at 6 months,and 1.2 at 12 months,respectively.Conclusion In treatment of severe midfoot fracture-dislocation,external biplanar mini-fixator combined with limited internal fixation can perfectly reconstruct and maintain the medial and lateral columns and normal geometry of the foot arch,preventing functional disability caused by foot malformation.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第9期737-740,共4页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词 足损伤 骨折 脱位 外固定器 Foot injuries Fractures,bone Dislocation External fixators
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Richter M, Wippermann B, Krettek C, et al. Fractures and fracture dislocations of the midfoot: occurrence, causes and long-term results [J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2001, 22: 392-398.
  • 2Sands AK, Grose A. Lisfranc injuries[J] . Injury, 2004, 35: SB71-SB76.
  • 3Thompson MC, Mormino MA. Injury to the tarsometatarsal joint complex[J]. J Am Aead Orthop Surg, 2003, 11: 260-267.
  • 4Weber M, Luther S. Reconstruction of the euboid in compression fractures: short to midterm results in 12 patients[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2002, 23: 1008-1013.
  • 5Chandran P, Purraswamaiah R, Dhillon MS, et al. Management of complex open fracture injuries of the midfoot with external fixation[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2006, 45: 308-315.
  • 6Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retro- spective and prospective analyses[J] . J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1976, 58: 453-458.
  • 7Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN. Problems in management of type H (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type nl open fractures[J]. J Trauma, 1984, 24: 742-746.
  • 8Benirschke SK, Meinberg E, Anderson SA, et al. Fractures and dislocations of the midfoot: Lisfranc and Chopart J.njuries[J]. ] Bone Joint Surg Am, 2012, 94: 1325-1337.
  • 9Arastu MH, Buckley RE, Tarsometatarsal joint complex and midtarsal injuries[J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2012, 79: 21-30.
  • 10梁晓军,李毅,赵宏谋,宋涛,鹿军,马强,潘文杰,杨杰.关节融合术治疗中足骨折脱位致平足症的疗效[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2013,15(3):207-211. 被引量:7

二级参考文献20

  • 1Rammeh S, Grass R, Zwipp H. Nutcracker fractures of the navicular and cuboid. Ther Umsch, 2004, 61: 451-457.
  • 2Main B J, Jowett RL. Injuries of the midtarsal joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1975, 57: 89-97.
  • 3Klaue K. Chopart fractures. Injury, 2004, 35: 64-70.
  • 4Kotter A, Wieberneit J, Braun W, et al. The Chopart dislocation. A frequently underestimated injury and its sequelae. A clinical study. Unfallchirurg, 1997, 100:737-741.
  • 5Richter M, Thermann H, Kuefner T, et al. Chopart joint fracture-dislocation: initial open reduction provides better outcome than closed reduction. Foot Ankle lnt, 2004, 25: 340-348.
  • 6Richter M, Thermann H, Kuefner T, et al. Fractures and fracture dislocations of the midfoot: occurrence, causes and long-term results. Foot Ankle Int, 2001, 22: 392-398.
  • 7Randt T, Dahlen T, Schikore H, et al. Dislocation fractures in the area of the middle foot: injuries of the Chopart and Lisfranc joint. Zentralbl Chir, 1998, 123: 1257-1266.
  • 8Mittlmeier T, Krowiorsch R, Brosinger S, et al. Gait function after fracturedislocation of the midtarsal and/or tarsometatarsal joints. Clin Biomech, 1997, 12:s16-s17.
  • 9/ Ghate SD, Sistla VM, Nemade V, et al. Screw and wire fixation fo / Lisfranc fracture dislocations. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2012,] / 20: 170-175.
  • 10Chandran P, Puttaswamaiah R, Dhillon MS, et al. Management of complex open fracture injuries of the midfoot with external fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2006, 45: 308-315.

共引文献7

同被引文献55

引证文献8

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部