摘要
五年前,安徽省移民局对农村公共建设管理体制的改革进行了重大探索,创造性地实践了另一种公共设施建设体制——村民自建体制。本文利用安徽省调研数据对当前两种体制为农民带来的"双重收益"进行实证比较。研究发现,不同类型村出现不同收益的根本原因在于农村公共设施建设体制机制的差异。移民村的自建体制较之非移民村的代建体制有更大的潜力,其体制优势在长期"较量"过程中不言而喻。
Five years ago, Anhui reservoir immigrants＇ areas creatively practiced another public facilities construction system named villagers self-build system. Through collection and analysis of the data in Anhui, the study found that the fundamental factor affecting different types of village is the structural mechanism of rural public infrastructure construction.Compared with the self-built system of immigrant village and the agent construction system of non-immigrant village, the former has more potential,with its system advantage in the process of long term ＂contest＂.
出处
《经济与管理研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第11期32-40,共9页
Research on Economics and Management
关键词
公共设施
自建体制
代建体制
农民收入
Public Facilities
Self-construction System
Agent-construction System
Farmers ＇ Income
